PROOF OF CPS CORRUPTION

FINAL STATUS REPORT - ONE BIG LIE

http://www.scribd.com/doc/12810232/Final-Status-Reportdepandancy-taken-for-NO-REASON-but-Money

Judges Sentenced - Kids for Cash

Source: http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/inquirer/20090128_

Editorial: Judges Sentenced

Kids for cash

The setting is Pennsylvania coal country, but it's a story right out of Dickens' grim 19th-century landscape: Two of Luzerne County's most senior judges on Monday were accused of sending children to jail in return for kickbacks.
The judges, Luzerne County President Judge Mark A. Ciavarella Jr., 58, and his predecessor, Senior Judge Michael T. Conahan, 56, will serve seven years in jail under a plea agreement.

They're alleged to have pocketed $2.6 million in payments from juvenile detention center operators.

When a federal judge reviews their plea, though, the question ought to be whether the punishment is adequate - along with the judges being bounced from the bench, disbarred, and losing their pensions.

If the allegations are true, Ciavarella and Conahan were involved in a disgraceful cabal far worse than one that merely lined their pockets.

First, the judges helped the detention centers land a county contract worth $58 million. Then their alleged scheme was to guarantee the operators a steady income by detaining juveniles, often on petty stuff.

Many of the kids were railroaded, according to allegations lodged with the state Supreme Court last year by the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center, an advocacy group.

In asking the court to intervene in April, the law center cited hundreds of examples where teens accused of minor mischief were pressured to waive their right to lawyers, and then shipped to a detention center.

One teen was given a 90-day sentence for having parodied a school administrator online. Such unwarranted detentions left "both children and parents feeling bewildered, violated and traumatized," center lawyers said.

"Very few people would stand up" to the Luzerne judges, according to the law center's executive director, Robert G. Schwartz.

Fortunately, Juvenile Law Center was willing to do so, along with backing from state Attorney General Tom Corbett's office and the state Department of Public Welfare.

The blind justices on the state's high court, though, took a pass. Only last month, they offered no explanation in declining to take up the law center's request that the court step up.

Now, the state Supreme Court should revisit the issue, since the scope of corruption alleged at the Luzerne County Courthouse in Wilkes-Barre could further undermine confidence in the courts statewide.

Authorities need to redress running roughshod over juveniles' rights - a process also likely to bring damage suits. While the local district attorney pledges to "do our best to right the situation," this calls for an independent, outside review.

The two judges' downfall may have rooted out the worst perpetrators of this evil scheme, but the abuse of power alleged in Luzerne County is so startling that it should send shock waves for reform around the state court system.

Webmaster:

Judge Picquet of San Luis Obispo refused to send my daughter home. He kept ordering my daughter back to "therapy"; even encouraging the GAL to speak with my daughter before her testimony so she could be coerced. He kept her off the stand and her her in Judges chambers. He obstructed Justice. He taunted my daughter during this closed meeting saying "I could send you home -- but I'm not going to". My daughter told him she wasn't abused and that we were close but all he did was twist her words. He told her she was "going to get on the plane like a good little girl" and two days later she was flown out of state against her will.

Judge Garrett obstructed Justice. In my testimony I told her my daughter was kidnapped and was taken illegally. She ignored this. I told her CPS's attorney Sheri V. who is with County Counsel stated she would send Jenny home in January 2008 yet they changed their mind after I told her I was not going back to California. This Judge stopped me from getting this on court record and prohibited me from questioning county counsel. she was obviously protecting them. I feel CPPS was attempting to lure my daughter back to California so they could keep her in the system until she was 21 years old.

Letter to School Superindentant in Atascadero CA

January 29, 2008 (They took custody away illegally on 1/26/09)
*contact me for copy of this hearing)

Dear school officials,

I have called many numbers  since my daughter was illegally kidnapped over one year ago by Child Protection Services. Not one person in San Luis Obispo helped my daughter or even listened to either of us. I was slandered with lies by this agency who used the Atascadero police to harass me. There was no child abuse or neglect yet the school allowed CPS to take my daughter from school without a warrant as required by law. There is no criminal conviction against me, nor was I given due process before custody was  transferred to the Father earlier this week, I have never been able to present my evidence due to the extreme corruption that exists and due to the "secret courts" of San Luis Obispo. 

I can't begin to explain what it feels like to see a child protection agency hurt my daughter and so many children. As a former foster parent I am literally appalled and anyone who was part of this maliciousness should be ashamed. If I hadn't seen this corruption with my own eyes I would never have believed it. I have documented all of  the events so that my daughter can sue once she turns 18. She will turn 18 in 8 months and there is no statue of limitations. If she decides to take action I will be 100% behind her because of how this deleterious act was carried out. 

 Although CPS  falsely accused me of "not protecting" my daughter this is not true. Jenny was in school at the time she cut herself and it was me who called the therapist. This cut was done  while she was in math class and witnesses saw this event. It was self inflicted and no one at school seemed to think it was "child abuse" for the false mandated report was made a week later, after I contacted the therapist when I noticed a scab on her arm.   My daughter was NOT in any imminent danger for she wasn't even home. Certainly there are plenty of mandated reporters at school so if there were a concern an investigation would have taken place before my ex-husbands emails.

Social Worker Amy Sensenbach kidnapped Jenny from school based upon false allegations which were made up by my ever spiteful ex-husband and his parents. There is a long history of hostility between us due to his actions during our last custody battle when he was in contempt of court for not returning our daughter. He alienated her from me and it took therapy to help Jennifer through those events. Shawn had lost two  prior custody cases so he used CPS.  The Judge's final determination was based on numerous reasons and there were home visits and Guardian Ad Litems, yet none of this was ever considered, 

Amy Sensenbach went on "witch hunts" against me and was assisting my ex-husband who lived 3,000 miles away;  communicating with him through emails BEFORE Jennifer was taken from school. The school allowed this Social Worker to remove Jenny without any proof  of abuse or neglect. There was NO investigation and there was NO imminent danger. There was NO visit to my home before the removal and there was NO warrant. This is is illegal. 

My daughter was kidnapped.

The school participated in this evil act by allowing this unlawful removal. They knew my daughter was a happy, popular teenager and certainly they knew she was not abused. I have have met with Ms. Rogers a few times and have attended school events. I have made contact whenever I had any concerns and I never had any problems with the school prior to my daughter's removal.

Jenny was taken without a mandated report and was placed into foster care illegally. She was not allowed to call me and her cell phone was taken away. She was a prisoner. Jenny and I tried to keep in touch with one another using  2 cell phones the school took it away and gave it to the social worker who gave it to the police. I had gone to the school and requested my phone but they refused to give it to me. 

I asked the school for help but I was treated poorly.  I requested that Jenny meet the child advocate who works at Atascadero High school but she refused. I contacted CASA  but they claimed they had a wait list and they never even met my daughter. I called the school Superintendent, the Board of Supervisors, and many others but no one would listen.  My daughter begged many people to help her go home. All of her requests were  ignored. She asked the Director of CPS, the school principal, school counselor, her attorney, social workers, foster mother, police, chaperone's, probation officer, and many others for help. She ran away but was hunted down like prey and dragged back into foster care. She tried to get emancipated but this too was denied. She was forced into "therapy" every time she wanted to go home. 
. 
Her attorney said to me “your daughter is hard nut to crack"

Social worker Amy Sensenbach not only takes children from school but she also writes the reports for the court and goes into Judges chambers during the hearings. My daughter tells me she wanted to take her home. This is on tape. So is the text message my daughter sent me telling me social worker Louise Tobin was in her bedroom at  11:30 at night. WHY? Of course I became alarmed, especially after witnessing sadistic behavior from workers at CPS. 

Jenny was  traumatizing for 6 months and was alienated from me for no reason. She was shuttled into  5-6 foster homes where she became very unstable.  Social workers, therapists and others worked on her head continually. They bribed, threatened, and coerced my daughter. When Jenny told them  wanted to go home they  placed her  in high security foster care where she was forced to have chaperone's with her at all times to make sure she didn't run home. She couldn't even go to the bathroom alone. She told me she scared. She became so depressed that she turned to drugs. She learned how to smash up pills and snort them from her foster sister who got them from Jenny's foster mother. I worried about my daughter constantly. She was sneaking out at night to call me and and was started ditching school. She tried so hard to stay in contact but everyone made this near impossible. For mother's day she snuck out to see me but we were surrounded by the police. She told them to take her to Juvenile hall if they wouldn't let her go home. Part of this tape can be seen on You Tube. CPS officials took down other videos on You Tube not because there was any violation of terms, but because they didn't want people to know that my daughter wasn't abused.

CPS ABUSED MY DAUGHTER

They were sadistic, they lied, they fabricated reports, they committed perjury, and many people worked in collusion with one another to carry out this organized crime. When Jenny started becoming emotionally distraught and  began cutting on herself she was sent out of state in the middle of the night. After she arrived the phone was disconnected. . Jenny did manage to contact a children's advocate who was able to get her statement on tape before her cell phone was taken away. While on an unscheduled “visitation” social worker Louise Tobin worked on transferring custody to the father. After a month when Jenny was to be returned Louise flew to Iowa to make arrangements to keep Jenny there. Jenny was forced to work at a daycare center so federal funds could be obtained. She was kept there so she would miss her own court dates. Jenny had met with the judge before going to Iowa. She begged him to let her go home. This was heard in Judges chambers so CPS made sure Jenny couldn't testify until they sent her to more “therapy” and turned her against me.

Jenny was not allowed to testify for most of her hearings. Her rights were continually violated. When I subpoenaed my daughter CPS would not present her in Court. Jenny was supposed to have a telephone testimony but this too was blocked. Jenny and her friends send me text messages but none of this evidence was allowed. Jenny put up a CPS reform video on her my space website the day before the hearing but this was ignored.

COMPLETE INJUSTICE

Everyone affiliated with CPS or who were Federally Funded ignored my calls Social workers changed their phone numbers frequently or were always on vacation. They purposely avoided my calls so that I would leave messages. I didn't mind because all this did was document the events of what a parent has to go through when CPS is unethical. Social workers violated HIIPA Laws contracted workers were paid to make false reports. They lied in Court and committed perjury. They also ruined my medical file.

Now our home is in foreclosure and we will lose everything we have.

What did we ever do to anyone to deserve to such evil?
.

Kathleen

DUE PROCESS IGNORED - ILLEGAL CHANGE OF CUSTODY

Violation of the following:
WIC 300(A) , 361(D)
CAL GOV CODE 820.21(2)(3)
TITLE 42, USC SECT 1983, 14141,
USC TITLE 18, SECTIONS 241, 245(3) 1203, 241, 242, 1001(1)(2)(3), AND 1203(A)
Civil Codes 1569(1)(2)(3), 1570(1)(3), 1571, 1572(1)(3)(4)

DISCUSSION ON CPS PRACTICES - NOTES FOR LAWSUIT

UNLAWFUL REMOVAL
The report CPS generated on January 22, 2008 which states Jenny should stay with her Mother and reunification is set for July 28th. Yet 3 days later, on January 25, 2008 she took Jenny from school. This occurred 43 days after the first removal. Amy listed fraudulent reasons for this second removal. She had not performed any investigations and her claims were based on “here-say”, which is unlawful.

1)No “protective custody warrant” was issued before removal as required by law. There was no “Imminent Danger of serious bodily injury” for minor was in school at the time. WIC 300(a)
2)The message received on my voice mail from the assistant principal, Ms. Donahue at Atascadero High school states Jenny was in school all day on January 25th. They state they had no prior knowledge of a removal by any social worker. Jenny didn’t come home from school that day. Was my daughter “Kidjacked”?
Section 300a of the Welfare and Institutions code states:
Any child who comes within any of the following descriptions is within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court which may adjudge that person to be a dependent child of the court:

(a) The child has suffered, or there is a substantial risk that the child will suffer, serious physical harm inflicted not accidentally upon the child by the child's parent or guardian. For the purposes of this Subdivision, a court may find there is a substantial risk of serious future injury based on the manner in which a less serious injury was inflicted, a history of repeated inflictions of injuries on the child or the child's siblings, or a combination of these and other actions by the parent or guardian which indicate the child is at risk of serious physical harm.

WIC 361(c) BURDEN OF PROOF
(c) A dependent child may not be taken from the physical custody of his or her parents or guardian or guardians with whom the child resides at the time the petition was initiated, unless the juvenile court finds clear and convincing evidence of any of the following circumstances listed in paragraphs (1) to (5), inclusive, and, in an Indian child custody proceeding, paragraph (6):
(1) There is or would be a substantial danger to the physical health, safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the minor if the minor were returned home, and there are no reasonable means by which the minor’s physical health can be protected without removing the minor from the minor’s parent’s or guardian’s physical custody. The fact that a minor has been adjudicated a dependent child of the court pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 300 shall constitute prima facie evidence that the minor cannot be safely left in the physical custody of the parent or guardian with whom the minor resided at the time of injury. The court shall consider, as a reasonable means to protect the minor, the option of removing an offending parent or guardian from the home. The court shall also consider, as a reasonable means to protect the minor, allowing a nonoffending parent or guardian to retain physical custody as long as that parent or guardian presents a plan acceptable to the court demonstrating that he or she will be able to protect the child from future harm.
(3) The minor is suffering severe emotional damage, as indicated by extreme anxiety, depression, withdrawal, or untoward aggressive behavior toward himself or herself or others, and there are no reasonable means by which the minor’s emotional health may be protected without removing the minor from the physical custody of his or her parent or guardian.
(4) The minor or a sibling of the minor has been sexually abused, or is deemed to be at substantial risk of being sexually abused, by a parent, guardian, or member of his or her household, or other person known to his or her parent, and there are no reasonable means by which the minor can be protected from further sexual abuse or a substantial risk of sexual abuse without removing the minor from his or her parent or guardian, or the minor does not wish to return to his or her parent or guardian.
(5) The minor has been left without any provision for his or her support, or a parent who has been incarcerated or institutionalized cannot arrange for the care of the minor, or a relative or other adult custodian with whom the child has been left by the parent is unwilling or unable to provide care or support for the child and the whereabouts of the parent is unknown and reasonable efforts to locate him or her have been unsuccessful.
Section 361(D) of the Welfare and Institutions code states
(d) The court shall make a determination as to whether reasonable efforts were made to prevent or to eliminate the need for removal of the minor from his or her home or, if the minor is removed for one of the reasons stated in paragraph (5) of subdivision (c), whether it was reasonable under the circumstances not to make any of those efforts, or, in the case of an Indian child custody proceeding, whether active efforts as required in Section 361.7 were made and that these efforts have proved unsuccessful. The court shall state the facts on which the decision to remove the minor is based.
1)Amy removed Jenny even though we complied with the “case plan”. We both completed the mental evaluation; I went to Drug and Alcohol for assessment and both obtained counseling.

ALIENATING MINOR WITHOUT JUST CAUSE
Section 362.1(1)(A)  States:

Subject to subparagraph (B), for visitation between the parent or guardian and the child. Visitation shall be as frequent as possible, consistent with the well being of the child.

Subparagraph (B) basically states the child will be safe and consistent with 3030 of the family code

ARGUMENT:
My daughter has been continually alienated from me from the start. The return date kept being extended while she was shuttled around into 5-6 foster homes. There was never any reunification attempts. They planned on transferring custody from the start based on FALSE charges. Again, tests proved the allegations were FALSE, yet CPS failed to return my daughter.

Section 300b of the Welfare and Institutions code states:

“…the court shall give deference to the parent’s or guardian’s medical treatment, non treatment, or spiritual treatment…and shall not assume jurisdiction unless necessary to protect the child” - I was sick with Anemia when they took my daughter yet they refused to allow me to seek medical treatment before making court dates and giving me a "case plan" to follow which was impossible to follow. *Medical tests prove this fact. This is probably why my house was broken into - to remove the proof.


CAL GOV GODE 821.21 SECTIONS 2 & 3

820.21. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, the civil immunity of juvenile court social workers, child protection workers, and other public employees authorized to initiate or conduct investigations or proceedings pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 200) of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code shall not extend to any of the following, if committed with malice:
(1) Perjury.
(2) Fabrication of evidence.
(3) Failure to disclose known exculpatory evidence.
(4) Obtaining testimony by duress, as defined in Section 1569 of
The Civil Code, fraud, as defined in either Section 1572 or Section
1573 of the Civil Code, or undue influence, as defined in Section
1575 of the Civil Code.
(b) As used in this section, "malice" means conduct that is
Intended by the person described in subdivision (a) to cause injury
To the plaintiff or despicable conduct that is carried on by the
Person described in subdivision (a) with a willful and conscious
Disregard of the rights or safety of others.

Argument:

Amy Sensenbach originally took Jenny on 12/9/07 over the door incident. She returned her on 12/14/07. She took Jenny again from school 43 days later without good cause. She did not have a “protective custody warrant and no other incidences occurred. She removed minor solely on “hearsay and then went on a Witch hunt” against the mother to justify the removal. She omitted facts and misled the Court. She failed to disclose exculpatory evidence and the removal was not done properly.

TITLE 42, USC SECT 1983, 14141,
Sec. 1983. - Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia 

TITLE 18 – CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
PART 1 –CRIMES
CHAPTER 55 KIDNAPPING
Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, seizes or detains and threatens to kill, to injure, or to continue to detain another person in order to compel a third person or a governmental organization to do or abstain from doing any act as an explicit or implicit condition for the release of the person detained, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life and, if the death of any person results, shall be punished by death or life imprisonment.
Section 2235. Search warrant procured maliciously Whoever maliciously and without probable cause procures a search warrant to be issued and executed, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year.
Section 2236. Searches without warrant
Whoever, being an officer, agent, or employee of the United States or any department or agency thereof, engaged in the enforcement of any law of the United States, searches any private dwelling used and occupied as such dwelling without a warrant directing such search, or maliciously and without reasonable cause searches any other building or property without a search warrant, shall be fined for a first offense not more than $1,000; and, for a subsequent offense, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
        This section shall not apply to any person -
          (a) serving a warrant of arrest; or
          (b) arresting or attempting to arrest a person committing or
        attempting to commit an offense in his presence, or who has
        committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having
        committed a felony; or
          (c) making a search at the request or invitation or with the
        consent of the occupant of the premises.

FRAUD – TITLE 18
PART 1 – CRIMES
CHAPTER 47 – FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS
Section 1001. Statements or entries generally
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully -
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party's counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
(c) With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to -
(1) administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or
(2)any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.
(3)

The appeals stated I did not get DUE PROCESS. Judge Garrett who heard the appeal ignored this and gave custody to the father. This case was flawed from the very beginning. CPS ignored this fact. They also ignored my daughters pleas to go home. All they wanted was the MONEY

LETS REFORM CPS AND STOP THE CORRUPTION

I wonder how much money they made off Jenny

JUDGE: Download & Send - CPS REFORM

Cheif Justice George _FamUnite

Publish at Scribd or explore others:

YOU BE THE JUDGE

Written to a Judge who contacted me:

Dear Judge XXXXXX, (names edited for privacy)

I spoke with Senator XXXXX a few weeks ago and have been meaning to call her back. Senator XXXXX knows my story and has been instrumental on bringing this situation to light.

We have a huge corruption problem going on in California and throughout the rest of nation. Good people are being destroyed by a system that was meant to help children. As a former foster parent I am appauled at what has become of the Child protection "industry".

I don't want my daughter to be part of this corruption. She's been sheltered for most of her life and she doesn't understand this sort of evil. My daughter had a very good life with me and we had a nice home. I own a business and I have taken my daughter all over the world. I have raised Jenny since she was 6 months old on my own and we are very close. Jenny was taken last January when she was 16 1/2 years old. CPS took my daughter and my best friend for no reason at all and they did horrible things to her.

Although it is true that my daughter and I had a squabble over a boy I disapproved of last December and I did admit to slightly damaging a "door" to my own home. I had no idea this was a crime or the nightmare I would have to endure because of this agency. An officer told me he did not feel this was child abuse and I cannot see anywhere in the law that state it is. Given the fact that my daughter is almost an adult I feel this incident was taken to the extreme. The damage was done after my daughter was being difficult and I insisted she go with me Christmas shopping. She wanted to sneak out to be with the boy so she kicked me in the lungs and I had an asthma attack. I have emphysema. I did not damage the door to hurt my daughter but rather it was to protect her from seeing the Juvenile deliquent abusive boyfriend. I was trying to open a locked door. CPS took Jenny and conspired with the Police who threw me in jail on $100,000 bail. The door was barely damaged and it was replaced. Jenny was returned 5 days later and we were told to go to counseling. We did everything CPS told us to do and I thought that was it. 43 days later they simply kidnapped my daughter from school.

*** JENNY WAS NOT TAKEN BECAUSE OF A "DOOR". SHE WAS TAKEN OVER A PAPER CLIP CUT THAT SHE INFLICTED TO HERSELF BECAUSE OF CONTINUAL VISITS BY A SOCIAL WORKER AT CPS ***

There were no fights during this 43 day period. Jenny and I usually get along great. My ex-husband started sending emails to the social worker right after she returned home. During this time period Jenny was receiving regular visits from a social worker at school without my knowledge. Jenny would come home moody and lock herself in her room while I obtained parenting books. I called CPS to better understand what was going on with my daughter and I even requested that they remove this social worker from our case. I felt she was biased after reading her report and correspondence with my ex who had made false allegations. My request was denied. This social worker wanted my daughter to see a "certain" therapist. Jenny didn't like the therapist, explaining that she was trying to negatively influence her thoughts.

I allowed Jenny to switch therapists but when the social worker found out she didn't like this. When I called my therapist to report that Jenny had cut herself on her arm at school wiith a paper clip the social worker used this as an excuse to take my daughter; stating this was an "emergency removal. Jenny was taken within two hours after I told her social worker I had found Jenny a different therapist. A FALSE mandated report was made AFTER my daughter was removed.

I would never have guessed that CPS could do such a thing, after all there has never been any history of me abusing Jenny. But CPS distorted and twisted the truth in court for no real reason. I feel they were prejudice against me because of the lies my ex-husband told them. He had lost TWO prior custody cases. I left my ex when Jenny was just a baby and although he was abusive towards me when we were together this never stopped me from letting him see his daughter. In fact, I even let him live on my ranch and work for my business. I had no malice towards him, but apparently he remained bitter. He always told me he had no intention of paying his back child support even after I had lowered his support to 275.00 a month with no interest. I feel certain he used CPS to get custody of our daughter and now I am losing everything I own because of it. CPS is not "custody court" and my daughters father is not a better parent than I am. Taking my daughter away served no real purpose other than traumatizing her.

As a mother it is painful to see how corrupt this agency is in San Luis Obispo. I saw how they hurt Jenny and made her emotionally unstable. Social workers and others coerced, bribed and threatened her. They used scare tactics that were sadistic in nature using "punishment-reward techniques". When Jenny told them she wanted to go home they placed her with chaperones 24 hours a day. She wasn't even allowed to go to the bathroom by herself. She was placed i 5-6 different foster homes and all I could do was cry. I visited her regularly while her father did not. He disconnected his phone. I was only able to see her 1 hour a week "supervised" and eventually CPS cut off all contact. Jenny started cutting all over herself but they still alienated her from me.

When she ran away and came home she was hunted down like prey and dragged back into foster care. She pleaded with everyone including her Attorney and the Judge to let her go home and even applied to become emancipated but Judge Picquet denied all of her requests. He also kept her off court record and told her she was going to "be a good little girl and get on the plane." She was forced to get on a plane in the middle of the night to "Iowa" where her father lives in a trailer.

Once there her cell phone was taken away and she was kept hostage. She wasn't allowed to leave the house and social workers forced her to get a job at a daycare center so she would be monitored while her father worked. This also prevented Jenny from making her court dates which CPS scheduled purposely while she was on a "visit" with her Dad. Jenny did NOT want to be in Iowa and she continued to cut. She told the Ankeny Police and social workers there but no one listened.

CPS went on witch hunts against me. They manufactured false evidence which they used in court. I took all of their drug and alcohol tests which proved I don't have a substance abuse problem but they wanted me to attend classes anyhow so they could get funding. They didn't notify me of court dates so I wouldn't be able to attend and this is how Jenny became a ward of the Court.

Everyone worked in collusion with one another. CPS has terrorized me for speaking out, even using the police who have manufactured lies and have broken into my home without a warrant. My court documents have been stolen and I suspect tampered with. The courts in SLO stamped the back of my filings and withheld my case files from me. CPS breaks every law that exists pertaining to Children Welfare and they do not follow the WIC guidelines. I had an attorney that I paid to help me but apparently he works closely with CPS. He did not represent my best interest. CPS is now using his partner as my daughter's Guardian Ad Litim who said to me "your daughter is a hard nut to crack". That says it all. No one represented my daughter's best interest. There was NO investigation. No one visited my home and CASA never even met my daughter.

CPS had no right to take my daughter for they had no true case of child abuse or neglect and they did not have a warrant as required by law.

CPS violated HIIPA laws and faxed confidential information to the doctors and slandered me. I didn't even know this Doctor and my health was jepordized because of their interference. Lies were placed into my medical file due to their slander and the doctor and therapist refused to give me copies of my file.

The Director of CPS Lee Collins told me he would turn me into a "Martyer" if I fought back. I brought a file cabinet to my meeting with him with all the laws and he told me he didn't care about the law and was "friends with the Judge". The Police issued me a false DUI to stop me from speaking out in Washington DC and now I have a warrant which is based on the another lie.

I have done TV and radio shows but CPS in San Luis Obispo keeps slandering my name and they even call into the radio stations stating that I am crazy when I do not have any mental condition. They do this tp parents to keep my daughter in the system. They have also placed an unlawful "gag order" on me but I pointed out to the Judge that he is required to uphold the US Constitution and asked him what is the big secret - the "paper clip or the door". This made him angry, especially after I offered to let him see his elected official form that he signed to uphold the Constitution. Then they tried to cite me on contempt. It was getting worse and after several house raids I decided to flee the state.

The State of California dropped the "door" charges but they still have my child.

The kangaroo courts that parents have to face due to CPS are horrendous. There is no justice in San Luis Obispo. I had videos, tape recordings and text messages from Jenny but they didn't care. CPS flagged the videos I had on YouTube of that Jenny and I made when she ran home because they wanted to hide the truth. Even the State Ombudsman wouldn't meet with me. It seems that the entire system is broken. The police won't charge the people who broke into my house and stole $30,000.00, my car, our belongings and now the bank has cut off my line of credit due to this fraud. My house is in foreclosure now and soon I will loose my business that was worth over 1 million dollars. Did I deserve this?

I never got the chance to present the truth.

This is why I want permission to take my daughter out of this country so that justice can prevail. I want to meet with the United Nations so we can open up these "secret" courts. I feel certain this would not have happened if spectators were witnessing the events and equally certain that there are other cases just like mine. I have reviewed the Geneva Treaty on Human Rights and many articles were were violated.

SIR, WE NEED TO LIFT THE VEIL AND OPEN UP THE COURTS SO JUSTICE CAN BE SERVED

Your Thoughts?

Kathleen Dearinger
Families Unite 4 Children's Rights Foundation
formally of San Luis Obispo County CA