WARNING: CRIME ALERT! CPS "Child Protection Services" is kidnapping children! Stop Organized Crime! View San Luis Obispo Children Non Profits: http://www.box.net/shared/cnp6fok9i8 View your county: visit: www.guidestar.com

Saturday, July 5, 2008

MAKE CHANGE HAPPEN NOW-EXPOSE THE DIRT


The above picture was taken on the very day we went to court. Jenny ran away after being in foster care for over 5 months. She was emotionally abused and was isolated from me. CPS told her lies and tried to break our bond. Jenny begged the judge to let her go home but he sent her back to foster care and 2 days later CPS put her on a plane to Iowa at 4am AGAINST HER WILL. When she arrived there was no phone and she was stipped of her cell phone leaving her with no way to call for help. She was not able to leave and is being kept "hostage" by my ex-husband and his family who refuse to let my daughter talk to me.

GET THE DIRT HERE FOLKS AND LETS MAKE CHANGE HAPPEN NOW:

www.guidestar.com

Go to this website and look up all of the Non-profit agencies affiliated with CPS. Look up anything that has to do with children services, Mental services, and anything that has to do with children and CPS.

Then take a look at who is on the Board of Directors. See if you can find your Judge, the Director of CPS, school officials, and anyone else you recognize. Then print out their tax returns. Now look how much money they are making off stealing children. See all of the TAX FREE income they are making by using phony Non-profit agencies?? Some of the board members state they have no income and only work 2 hours per week yet salaries are in the millions. As a law abiding tax paying citizen this inferiorates me.

NOTE: a non-profit agency has to pay at least 15% of their income to the IRS, but it seems to me kidnapping children for profit is illegal and falls into the catagory of "money laundering" through racketeering. Take a look at the RICO act at:

http://law.jrank.org/pages/12397/RICO.html
**************************************************************************

MY ARTICLE ABOUT POLITICAL CORRUPTION IN MY TOWN - SPREAD THE WORD FOLKS. LETS GET OUT THE DIRTY POLITICIANS:

There's more to it folks but at the risk of having to relocate to another country I had to eliminate some things involving corrupt politicians:

http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_crime&Number=296332069&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=21&part

My blog:
www.cpscorruption.blogspot.com

***************************************************************************
MAKE SURE YOU BOOKMARK SENATOR NANCY SCHAFFER'S BLOG. ITS FILLED WITH VALUABLE INFORMATION & UNITES ALL OF US WHO WANT TO SHARE OUR STORIES AND FILE A CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS

BLOGS BY NANCY SCHAFFER:

http://disgustedwiththesystem.blogspot.com/

http://disgustedwiththesystem.blogspot.com/2008/07/letter-from-senator-nancy-schaefer-to.html

Nancy goes after the Feds to support families: http://disgustedwiththesystem.blogspot.com/2008/03/senator-nancy-schaefer.html GO NANCY GO!!!!!

Donations can be sent to: http://www.senatornancyschaefer.com/pdf/2008cb1.pdf

********************************************************************
A T T E N T I O N P A R E N T S !!
G E T R E A D Y....we're about to reform CPS
********************************************************************
GETTING STARTED ON LAWSUIT IN YOUR AREA:

UCRCoA Operation Regions: http://unitedcivilrights.org/regions.html

http://unitedcivilrights.org/plightofcps.html

http://indianacrc.org/FAQ.html

********************************************************************

Are you involved in a heated custody battle over your adopted child? Contact Dr. Phil at: http://www.drphil.com/plugger/respond/?plugID=12088

My letter to the Board of Supervisors in SLO

Dear Board Of Directors,
I was wondering how much everyone is making from kidnapping my daughter Jennifer. I hear a "useful" child can bring in as much as $250,000 for the County. Maybe your finance department (David Edge) could answer these questions. We are doing a news article and I would like to get accurate information for this story.
By the way, does CPS usually send children to unsafe situations? I'm just concerned because my daughter has been drunk all week on vodka while being at her Father's house in Iowa. Dad drinks Vodka and takes "waker upper pills", which my daughter has also been into. My daughter was swimming in a pool drunk the other day and she is now in Kansas drinking again while Grandma is off gambling.
My daughter also learned how to do drugs while in foster care. I guess the foster mom is strung out on the pain killers and my daughter learned how to snort them from her foster sister Hanna. The foster mom also slapped my kid I'm concerned because CPS thinks damaging a "door" is Child abuse.
I don't allow boys in my daughter’s bedroom since she's only 16, but CPS does. Now we have to deal with a pregnancy scare. If that happens CPS gets two for one and then they can get even more BLOCK GRANTS. Maybe they can give the baby a "mental disorder" and collect even more federal funds. Woopie! Maybe they will adopt both of them out during your "adoption Saturdays" events that Judges and Attorney participate in. Then you can all celebrate. Cha-ching-cha-ching-cha-ching-cha-ching!
Maybe CPS will give custody to the Father because I am not falling for the “therapy” game after CPS falsified documents before the Court. They would rather send my daughter to a man who is abusive, owes a ton of back child support, and who wasn't involved in most of his daughter’s life. It seems that CPS has turned into advocates for fathers rights so I'll maybe send them some more business.CPS can handle custody cases from now on.

So what's wrong with this picture? Everything. Who do you think is in need of "therapy" most? ah never mind...........we’ll let the pubic decide once I do more articles, TV and radio.

Please send proof that you had the right to kidnap my child who was taken against her will, without a protective custody warrant. She has told her attorney, social workers, and the court for 6 months that she wants to come home. I believe her rights have been violated.
I have a deadline to meet so please email the information ASAP.

An Angry Mother,

Kathleen Dearinger

ps. This case has many flaws and my daughter will sue the County once she's 18. That's only 1 year away. Cha-ching-cha-ching-cha-ching-cha-ching-cha-ching-cha-ching-cha-ching-cha-ching.

HEY EVERYBODY THERE ARE ALOT OF PEOPLE SUING! VISIT:http://unitedcivilrights.org/prosenetwork.html

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Monday, June 30, 2008

Sunday, June 29, 2008

CPS CORRUPTION AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING EXPOSED IN SAN LUIS OBISPO

CPS CORRUPTION AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING EXPOSED IN SAN LUIS OBISPO
Republicans Sam Blakeslee and Able Maldonado have teamed together for a child charity in the greater San Luis Obispo area named "The Family Care Connection". While promoting this charity both politicians refuse to review corruption in the local CPS office.
Legislation gives states incentives under Title IV-E to increase the number of children adopted out from foster care. Title IV funding provided to local CPS offices is being used for capturing and adopting out children. However, not all of these children are abused or neglected. Many children who are taken by CPS are not at risk or in any danger thus our Government is creating a form of "child trafficking". Children are becoming a very "profitable commodity". Under section 1962(b) of the RICO Act it unlawful for a person to acquire or maintain an interest in an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity. Since a RICO claim cannot be made in the absence of criminal activity many parents are being unjustly prosecuted in kangaroo courts so that children can remain in the "system". Almost half of the children taken by CPS are being adopted out using this technique. Assemblyman Blakeslee and Senator Maldonado's actions are protecting this practice by not responding to innocent desperate parents who have sought their assistance from improper removals by overeager Social Workers. These politicians have turned a blind eye to the CPS practices and to the children and families who are being abused by the CPS system they support.
Assemblyman Blakeslee's office claims they have no involvement with CPS proceedures, yet has contacted them when children from the "Family Care Network" are at risk of escaping foster care. Senator Maldonado thinks some parents are "terrorists" if they seek his help. Some children have chaperones with them at all times so they don't try to run away to return home to their loving parents. The benefit of these unethical practices include: increased funding, full staffing, and support of their share of over 1.6 billion dollars would be lost if this corruption were exposed. This does not include the block grants exceeding 200 million dollars annually and other incentives. In a recent publication supported by Senator Maldonado and Assemblymember Sam Blakeslee The Family Care connection is asking people to write to Governor Schwarzenegger to speak out against a budget slash of 5% in foster care funding; while knowing the author of this article has been seeking their assistance for close to 6 months.
The standard practices of CPS offices throughout California and other states have been under scrutiny for the last several years. Since President Clinton placed into effect The Adoption Safe Families Act block grants have increased the number of children who are in the system. The state pays extra incentives for adopting out children over the age of 9 years old and additional funds if they require mental services or have other special needs. As a result of these block grants almost 50% of all children in CPS’s care are between the ages of 13-19 years old. Every day 36 children an hour are taken by CPS throughout the United States. In California alone more than 20% of all children are in foster care.
This is an industry, which has grown by huge proportions and must be reined in. The Gestapo type tactics currently being used by County and State agencies to increase revenue from federal sources may provide jobs today for the local economy but is having a negative impact on many levels. Good families are being torn apart and children are dying under the State's care. When CPS takes children in error they rarely return them right away. The families are subjected to endless classes and programs whether or not they are guilty. The parents suffer great financial hardships because they are forced to retain expensive independent legal counsel. Many families lose their jobs and their homes trying to get their children out of the system. Some attorney's are working in collision with CPS and help keep children in the system because it's profitable, but most will agree that CPS is in fact corrupt.
Common practices of CPS agencies include: Not investigating before removing a child, taking children into state custody based upon here say, taking children from school without a "Protective Custody Warrant", manipulating the Court system in criminal cases against the parents who are improperly prosecuted, obstruction of justice, fabricating documents, omitting facts, coercing minors, deception, isolating children from their parents, breaking bonds, traumatizing children, negative therapy, and placing children in unsafe foster homes. Children are not being evaluated right away by a doctor or seeing child advocates such as CASA. Social workers have been known to go on “witch hunts” against parents, influencing doctors, and ruining parents medical files. Many CPS agencies work in collusion with therapists who give parents false "mental conditions" which is used against them in court. Family court is "secret" so there is no jury or fair trial. Children are being heard in Judges chambers so many testimonies cannot be documented on Court record.
Many judges who rule on family court cases also sit on the boards of phony nonprofit organizations created to generate state adoption/foster care grants via federal funding. San Luis Obispo CPS has politicians heading non-profit organizations and Judges hosting “Adoption Saturdays”. California’s 2003 Little Hoover Commission Report said up to 70 percent of children in foster care should never have been removed from their homes in the first place. Children who complain about foster care or beg to go home are either placed on psychotropic medication and are sometimes sent out of State. California's website for children up for adoption can be found at: www.adoptuskids.org
Dr. Moore who is the National Director of legislative affairs for the American Family Rights Association is heading up chapters under the NAACP. Children’s rights organizations, parents, and independent non-profit agencies are also joining in the fight against CPS corruption and human trafficking. Senator Nancy Schaffer recently passed a new law that went into effect in Oklahoma and we in California are hopeful that our state will soon follow.
Kathleen Dearinger of Atascadero California is a CPS reform activist who is committed to overseeing change within her local area. She believes that the structure of CPS and Family court need to be revised and that a system designed to protect children should not be abusing the children themselves. CPS and others should not be profiting off of helpless children, whose many rights are being violated. She is working in conjunction with a number of reform and Civil Rights organizations, including Dr. Shirley Moore, the NAACP, Libertarian Groups, Serenah’s Angels, Voice for the Children, Hope4Kids, Cherish the Children, and many others to address the issues of CPS abuse. She views the biggest problem is having no accountability and poorly trained social workers who are being granted "immunity" from prosecution. The Obudsman with the Department of Social Services located in Sacramento is not effective in overseeing the CPS cases of San Luis Obispo due to their geographic location. Additionally, they represent foster care, which is a conflict of interest, and are being provided with inaccurate information from case files given to them by CPS. CPS does not currently have an internal affairs division to be able to correct the many deficiencies. Often times local police aren't involved in the removal of children; nor do they assist parents who have been wrongly accused of abuse or neglect. Ms. Dearinger wishes to develop a system that will compel CPS to abide by State and Federal laws and stop them from terrorizing families. She believes that policing agencies need to be incorporated each time a child is removed. This will ensure that the removal is being performed according to the WIC guidelines. Each removal should be fully documented, and pictures taken. Parents should be interviewed, and Protective Custody warrants should be issued "before" a child is ever removed from their home and placed into foster care. We have policing agencies on call 24 hours a day so there is no reason not to utilize their services.
The downward spiral of our society will continue until drastic changes are enacted. Reform is badly needed. Families will continue to be abused by CPS until we establish a system that actually provides protections for not only the children involved but also for the family. A strong family is the backbone of this nation, and these children are our future. The current policies and trends in family law and child protective services have hit the family hard; touching the lives of untold millions. We hope that California will revise the Child Protective Laws so that many of these children are better protected and those that are not abused can finally go home to where they belong.
About the Author:
Kathleen Dearinger is a Mother to her 16 year old daughter who was “kidjacked” from school by CPS of San Luis Obispo. Her daughter who was not abused or neglected was taken without a protective custody warrant by a biased social worker who never investigated or even visited her house. Her daughter was isolated from her and traumatized by workers at CPS for 5 long months before being sent out of state in the middle of the night against her wishes. She remains a hostage as of this writing and is unable to contact her mother at the direction of a social workers with CPS, who falsely claims she is on a “voluntary placement”. Ms. Dearinger has requested the assistance from Senator Maldonado, Assemblyman Blakeslee, the police, the FBI, and many other agencies only to find that no one investigates or oversees CPS workers. This is why we have over 500,000 children in foster care today.
cc: Huffington Post

Friday, June 20, 2008

The kidnapping of Jenny....life in foster care

Well here's my UNABUSED daughter before and after CPS Kidjacked her. They sent her to Iowa in the middle of the night so she wouldn't run home. Now they've taken away her cell phone and she is being kept hostage 24/7. No phones and no way to call for help. CPS is a sick agency

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Ca. Government Officials Link & contact

Government Officials: http://www.ifn.net/classic/gov/index2.html

Joint Legislative Audit Commitee: 916-319-3300/319-2352

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Closeby News: 3yr dies in foster care-6/14/08 CALL NEWSPAPER TO INVESTIGATE CPS

Santa Maria foster mother arrested on suspicion of murder

Saturday, June 14, 2008

Printable VersionEmail This Article del.icio.us
Digg
Technorati
Reddit
Facebook Slashdot
Fark
Newsvine
Google Bookmarks
Georgia (default)
Verdana
Times New Roman
Arial
(06-14) 00:44 PDT Santa Maria, CA (AP) --

Authorities say a woman who is both aunt and foster mother to a 3-year-old child found dead in Santa Maria has been arrested for investigation of murder.

Santa Maria Police said Friday 27-year-old Sylvia Marie Dominguez was arrested on suspicion of murder and willful infliction of injury to a child causing great bodily injury or death.

Police Lt. Dan Ast says emergency crews responded to a report that the boy -- Gilbert Dominguez -- was not breathing.

He was pronounced dead soon after rescue workers arrived. A criminal investigation was opened because of injuries on the boy's body.

Three other children in Dominguez's care were put in the custody of child welfare services.

___

Information from: Santa Maria Times

CALL THE NEWSPAPER AND ASK THEM WHY THEY DON'T RUN A STORY ON CPS. 805-925-2691

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

CPS = WAR on CHILDREN

The Way Home (Gag-Order Back Door)

Give rights to your site to Serenah's Angels. New book coming out soon. Keep up the great work Patience!

Webisode 1

CPS - NO JUSTICE

Fighting4Families Intro

I love it!!!! Yeah Yeah. We need one of these in California. Patience??? where are you?

Monday, June 16, 2008

Jenny Speaks: The day CPS kidnapped me

This was Jenny when she ran away from the drug addict abusive foster home. She snuck home and hid in trees dispite a warrant to take her back into state custody. The next day her heart was ripped out when the Judge ordered her back to foster care and CPS wisked her out of the state on a 4am flight - obstructing justice.

Sunday, June 15, 2008

CPS forces child out of state against her will

I IMPLORE THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO INVESTIGATE THIS HOLOCAUST AND TO BRING THESE CIVIL SERVANTS WHO HAVE COMMITTED THESE CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY BEFORE DISPLINARY BODIES. RETURN THESE CHILDREN TO THEIR NATURAL PARENTS, AND PUT LEGISLATION INTO PLACE THAT WILL PROTECT THESE CHILDREN FROM THE VERY SYSTEM THAT IS DETROYING SO MANY. STOP THIS HOLOCAUST SO THAT THE PURPETRATORS CANNOT PSYCHOLOGICALLY DESTROY ANY OTHER CHILDREN WHO ARE VICTIMS OF CPS.

Monday, May 26, 2008

Conspiracy of Silence :The Franklin Cover-Up (5 of 6)

Conspiracy of Silence :The Franklin Cover-Up (4 of 6)

Conspiracy Of Silence - US Politicians Pedophile Ring - 3/6

CPS-Challenge the Veil of Secrecy

COME ON PEOPLE. LETS CHALLENGE CPS. OPEN UP THE COURTS. DEMAND JURY TRIALS! WE CAN HAVE A JURY TRIAL OVER A SPEEDING TICKET SO WHY NOT HAVE ONE WHEN CPS TAKES OUR KID? EVEN MURDERERS GET JURY TRIALS!

Sunday, May 25, 2008

THE ASSEMBLYMEN LIST

AREAS RESPONSIBLE FOR

Primary jurisdictions are child welfare services, foster care, adoption assistance, child care, nutrition programs, CalWORKs, Food Stamps, SSI/SSP, developmental disability services, Adult Protective Services, In-home Supportive Services and community care licensing.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Committee Members

Committee Members District Phone E-mail
Jim Beall Jr. - Chair Dem-24 (916) 319-2024 Assemblymember.Beall@assembly.ca.gov
Tom Berryhill - Vice Chair Rep-25 (916) 319-2025 Assemblymember.Berryhill@assembly.ca.gov
Mike Davis Dem-48 (916) 319-2048 Assemblymember.Davis@assembly.ca.gov
Mark DeSaulnier Dem-11 (916) 319-2011 Assemblymember.DeSaulnier@assembly.ca.gov
Warren T. Furutani Dem-55 (916) 319-2055 Assemblymember.Furutani@assembly.ca.gov
Paul Krekorian Dem-43 (916) 319-2043 Assemblymember.Krekorian@assembly.ca.gov
Todd Spitzer Rep-71 (916) 319-2071 Assemblymember.spitzer@assembly.ca.gov

Kathleen Dearinger fights CPS, part 4

CONTACT YOUR SENATORS - VOICE YOUR SUPPORT FOR S661 / HR2188

PEW Child Welfare Symposium

WRITE YOUR SENATORS!!! SUPPORT S661/HR 2188

Today's Family presents Prevent Child Abuse America.

GREAT VIDEO. Thanks! Forwarding to everyone! check out my videos
Kathleen

Black Bart Robers Thoughts on CPS

Regarding that riduculous letter from a CPS Fascist who says 96% of the accussed are guilty. CPS has the worst reputation of anyone since Hitler. Even the teachers are afraid of CPS and call them Fascists. The federal government passed a law requiring every state to pass laws to protect parents and children. California passed AB636.

I was involved in your disgusting actions when my wife died of cancer. i am introducing legislation directed to the County intervention in the case of a death in the family.

"A case worker (as you describe) who has seen such horrible transgressions of violence and sexual molestations will not be in a correct frame of mind to handle a case where there is a death in the family. A separate person well trained who has not been subjected to this violence is (by the law i am introducing) required to interview a child when the Mother dies."

Rather than ask the usual questions of did your father molest you, how about helping? Assure that frightened child that her father is depressed and cannot care for her then. How frightened can a daughter be when after seeing her strong Father turned to depressed mush and her Mother die? How about, "CPS will help until he is better. Your father loves you and would not harm you in any way."

How do you think it feels to lose my wife to cancer. Then have my child taken from me becasue i am depressed. Then when i think CPS and the Courts are there to help me i am accussed of sexually molesting my 11 year old daughter. Then have court documents say she thought i was going to kill her and kill myself.

Yes i was depressed but i know depression and can handle it without dying.

Maybe if even the best of CPS,David, who i liked had read the books they recommend they would understand what to do.

According to Motherless Daughter's by Hope Edelman when a Mother dies while the daughter is in puberty that daughter feels the Father will sexually molest her by placing her in the position of his wife.

This happened to me then when i read the book it fit. Amazingly a CPS worker, David, who i liked recommended the book. His wife had died and his children had read it.

Oh, but he did not read it.

That will sit fine when i call CPS into court in the California Supreme Court for reckless endangerment of my child's life AKA attempted murder. Oh sorry, i forgot you have immunity. Just keep on the armbands so we know who you are.

Just to your credit: I would not do your job and i also if i did i also would be wanting to imprison every man who ever walked the face of the earth after seeing what CPS sees. Cigarette burns on two year olds to keep them from crying. Sodomy that almost resulted in the death of a two year old.

Still you accuse everyone of sexually molesting the child in order to intimidate them. Then the child goes to Foster Care and all the system makes money.

As for me? I am ready to give up my citizenship and move to another country where there is some decency in family life and some remaining social fabric. I never had therapy with my child and could never talk to her. Now after seven years of separation when trying to set up a Roth IRA with the $100,000 we set aside for her i was hauled into court again. I have been in jail a total of 88 days for breaking restraining orders. Yup, i did call my daughter on her Birthday. Off again to Camp Snoopy (County Jail). See You next March 10 also.

Believe it or not some men are decent husbands, Fathers and Men. And i am one of the remaining actual Americans. I fight for my rights in court, the Legislature and with words.

Robert J. Lanier

AKA Black Bart Roberts
After the Greatest Pirate Ever Known

Saturday, May 24, 2008

"THE LIST" .....and GROWING

Clerk of The Board of Supervisors

Santa Clara County

70 West Hedding Street, East West, 10th Floor

San Jose, CA 95110


_____________________________________________________________________________________

County of Santa Clara

Department of Risk Management

Insurance and Complaint Division

1735 North First Street, Suite 108

San Jose, CA 95112

408 392 3460, Fax 408 441 6498


_____________________________________________________________________________________



Governor Arnold Swartzenhager

State of California

Office of Governor

State Capitol

Sacramento, CA 95814


_____________________________________________________________________________________


Constituent Affairs Representative

Office of the Governor

State of California

State Capitol

Sacramento, CA 95814


_____________________________________________________________________________________

California Dept. of Social Services

Public Inquiry Response MS 16-23

State Hearings Division

P.O. Box 944243

Sacramento, CA94244-2430


_____________________________________________________________________________________

Director of CDSS

744 P Street

Sacramento, CA 95814


_____________________________________________________________________________________

President George Bush

President of the United States

White House

Washington, DC 20447


_____________________________________________________________________________________


Office of the Inspector General

Attn: Investigations Division

950 Pennsylvania Av., NW Suite 4706

Washington, DC20530-0001


_____________________________________________________________________________________

Attorney General

US Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania AV

Washington, DC 20530U.S.


_____________________________________________________________________________________

Department of Health & Human Services

Administration for Children and Families

Public Inquiry Unit, Region IX

50 United Nations Plaza, Rm. 450

San Francisco, CA 94102

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Your local Legislators:


CA Senator Barbara Boxer

1700Montgomery Street, Suite 240

San Francisco, CA 94111

(415) 403-0100

(415) 956-6701 fax

_____________________________________________________________________________________

CA Senator Diane Fienstein

One Post Street,

Suite 2450

San Francisco, CA 94104

(415) 393-0707CA

ARTICLE: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WANT TO LIFT THE SECRECY

BOARD WANTS PROBE CONTINUED
Richard Jackoway
The Tribune
While the repo man can snatch your car and IRS agents can garnish your wages, only Child Protective Services is empowered to take away your children.

With that in mind, the county Board of Supervisors this week told the grand jury that it should try again to lift the legal veil of secrecy around CPS operations. In June, the 19 jury members said they had been rebuffed in attempts to investigate complaints that Child Protective Services had often been heavy-handed and unfair in its handling...

Published on 2001-09-29, Page B1, Tribune, The (San Luis Obispo, CA)
I DEALT WITH THE SAME EXACT PEOPLE....I WONDER IF THERES A CONNECTION.....

FISHER-MY OLD ATTORNEY. DIDNT HELP AT ALL

CARRASCO-MY DAUGHTERS GUARDIAN AD LITUM. PARTNER OF FISHER.

DR. PENNEL-DR LISTED IN MY CRIMMINAL CASE. I NEVER HEARD OF HIM MUCH LESS MET HIM.

BLAKESLEE-ACROSS THE STREET FROM FISHER. ASSOCIATED WITH ATASCADERO STATE HOSP- WHERE DR FENNEL WORKS. HIS OFFICE SAYS HE DOESNT DEAL WITH CPS ISSUES. THEY WONT HELP ME. HIS OFFICE CALLS COPS TELLS THEM I'M GOING TO KIDNAP MY CHILD. MY HOUSE GETS RAIDED THE SAME DAY. POLICE GO THROUGH MY HOUSE AND OPEN UP DRAWERS. QUESTION MY WORKER ON WHO I'M TALKING TO.

**********************************************************************************
Aloha Mr. Zaslow, Wall Street Journal
RE: Last Lecture Series.

Another great article. Here i am reading and writing and not Day Trading on option expirations day.

My Motto: Take the worst and try to make the world a better place.

My wife, a physician, died of cancer in 2000. My life was shattered. My 11 year old daughter and i were separated due to depression which we both suffered. After many years of staring at that Brick Wall that Dr. Pausch speaks of in his lecture somehow the winning spirit of my wife took over my brain. Stanford and her parents taught her she could do anything.

Feeling her inside me i am now introducing legislation in California via Representative Sam Blakeslee regarding how the County Social Services System, Child Protective Services, handles a situation of a death in the family.

I would have thought that trying to improve the system would be accepted especially after a Federal Supreme Court order requiring passage of reform bills in every state. California passed AB636 in response. Our County SLO was chosen as a model for reforming. I attended (uninvited) one of the required Forums. I was the only parent.

No. Not an easy task when challenging the government. I have been three times in jail for breaking restraining orders such as calling my child on her Birthday. A total of 88 days, $7,500 in bail bonds and $4,000 in legal fees and intimidation from Judge Michael Duffy of SLO Superior Court and intimidation while in jail from David Fennel, M.D. who is also one of the head psychiatrists at Atascadero State mental Hospital for the criminally insane. Yes this is a formal charge against both of them.

Dr. Fennel had declared me mentally incompetent to stand trial. I was held until i was okay, meaning taking the Rx Risperdal that killed my will power. I was fighting for my rights rather than roll over and admit calling my daughter was a criminal act. I could be held as long as i was incompetent. Again when asking for a trial he gave a competency exam in jail.

i asked what the outcome of the exam.

"If you are found mentally incompetent we may send you to Atascadero. (along with the mass murderers for calling my daughter on her Birthday?) If you are competent you will probably be released with time served. Will you take time served? (rather than insist on a trial by jury as i had requested for the last four years)

Gee let me think?

Okay he did intimidate me. Judge Michael Duffy also then denied my request for a trial by jury saying i would be set free today but not allowed out on bail if i requested a trial. (then of course i would be declared mentally incompetent) My attorney David Fisher of Coward and Wimp, i mean Fisher and Carrasco stood by the judge as i was in shackles. Another man had committed a robbery and was let out on bail.

Okay guys, was i intimidated? My future web site will answer that.

Judge Michael Duffy the second time put me in jail for sending him copies of letters to the Governor and the news media asking for legal changes. He considered it a threat to him. I wonder what he will think of this blog that is hopefully searchable by his name.

I was warned by a County employee who worked at mental health but was not on my case that he had heard through the Grapevine that i was sending letters to Judge Michael Duffy. If i sent more i would be arrested. I told him i do not like being intimidated. Pass that back up the Grapevine.

Then from Wyoming i sent the judge a postcard. The picture was three skunks. The caption was., "Wyoming Air Freshener."

i said nothing but my name, address, e-mail, telephone and case number. Off to jail.

Below is a future web site to be posted when i am living in another Nation. I am tired of being in jail. It will be political and also integrate western traditional cancer medicine with natural medicine, diet and alternative treatments such as Oasis of Hope Hospital in Mexico.

MyCancerHope.com

Robert J. Lanier
San Luis Obispo County California
Loving Father, Husband and alleged Criminal
AKA Black Bart Roberts

If you would like a copy of an entertaining attack on the County government e-mail me and request,

Warning: It is a Crime in California to Tell Montana Jokes.

MontanaCrime@yahoo.com

Senator Of Georgia- new Bill (Nancy Schaffer)

08 LC 28 3943

Senate Bill 415
By: Senators Schaefer of the 50th, Williams of the 19th, Pearson of the 51st, Murphy of the 27th, Douglas of the 17th and others
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT

To amend Chapter 11 of Title 15 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to juvenile proceedings, so as to reduce the time allowed for the Department of Human Resources to provide emergency care and supervision to a child without a court order; to remove certain immunities; to require a court order to enter the residence of a parent or guardian to seize a child under certain circumstances; to provide that juvenile deprivation hearings shall not be closed except upon the written application of the parents or guardians of the child or children who are the subject of the hearing; to provide that efforts shall be made to place children with relatives prior to transferring custody of such children to the Department of Human Resources; to provide for notices and procedures; to provide for a limitation on certain actions to terminate parental rights; to provide for discovery in termination proceedings; to provide for sanctions for failure to provide discovery; to amend Chapter 8 of Title 19 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to adoptions, to prohibit the state from applying for, obtaining, receiving, or accepting any adoption incentive payments under the federal Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997, P.L. 105-89, 42 U.S.C. Section 673b, or any similar federal legislation providing incentive funds to the states for promoting adoptions; to provide for related matters; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other purposes.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF GEORGIA:
SECTION 1.Chapter 11 of Title 15 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to juvenile proceedings, is amended by revising Code Section 15-11-14, relating to emergency care and supervision of child by Department of Human Resources, as follows:"15-11-14.(a) Notwithstanding Code Section 15-11-45 or any other provision of law, the Department of Human Resources is authorized to provide emergency care and supervision to any child without seeking a court order for a period not to exceed seven days 72 hours when:(1) As a result of an immediate emergency or illness, the person who has physical and legal custody of the child or children is unable to provide for the care and supervision of the child or children, and such person or a law enforcement officer, emergency personnel employed by a licensed ambulance provider, fire rescue personnel, or a hospital administrator or his or her designee requests that the department exercise such emergency custody; and(2) The child or children are not at imminent risk of abuse or neglect, other than the risks arising from being without a caretaker.During such period, the department shall endeavor to place the child or children with a relative of the parent or guardian, in shelter care, or in emergency foster care or shall make other appropriate placement arrangements. The department shall have the same rights and powers with regard to the child or children as does the custodial parent or other legal custodian.(b) Immediately upon receiving custody of the child or children, the department shall begin a diligent search for a relative or other designee of the parent who can provide for the care and supervision of the child or children.(c) At any time during such seven-day 72 hour period, upon the parent or guardian´s notification to the department that the parent or guardian, or a relative or designee thereof, is able to provide care to and exercise control over the child or children, the department shall release the child or children to the person having custody of the child or children at the time the child or children were taken into the custody of the department or to such person´s relative or designee except as provided in subsection (d) of this Code section.(d) Upon the expiration of such seven-day 72 hour period, if the child or children have not been released pursuant to subsection (c) of this Code section or if the department determines that there is an issue of neglect, abandonment, or abuse, the department shall promptly contact a juvenile court intake officer or bring the child or children before the juvenile court pursuant to Code Section 15-11-47 or 15-11-49. If, upon making an investigation, the intake or other authorized officer of the court finds that shelter care is warranted for the child or children, then, for purposes of this chapter, the child or children shall be deemed to have been placed in shelter care at the time such finding was made. The department may take such other and further actions under this article and all other provisions of law, as are authorized and appropriate, with regard to the child or children.(e) During the period when a child is in the care and supervision of the department pursuant to this Code section, the department shall have the same authority to consent to medical treatment for the child as does the child´s custodial parent or other legal custodian; provided, however, that no medication shall be administered to the child over the objection of the custodial parent or legal custodian.(f) The department and its successors, agents, assigns, and employees shall be immune from any and all liability for providing care and supervision for a child pursuant to subsection (a) of this Code section, for consenting to medical treatment for the child pursuant to subsection (e) of this Code section, and for releasing the child pursuant to subsection (c) of this Code section. This immunity shall not extend to seizures of children that are found to be in violation of this article nor to the administration of medication to a child over the objection of the custodial parent or legal custodian."
SECTION 2.Said chapter is further amended by revising Code Section 15-11-45, relating to when a child may be taken into custody, by adding a new subsection as follows:"(d) Except in cases involving an immediate threat to the health or safety of a child, no person, including a law enforcement officer or duly authorized officer of the court, shall enter the residence of such child´s parent or guardian to take such child into custody based upon allegations of deprivation or abuse without a court order issued after a finding of probable cause by the court authorizing such entry and taking of such child."
SECTION 3.Said chapter is further amended by revising subsection (a) of Code Section 15-11-58, relating to reasonable efforts regarding reunification of family, as follows:"(a) A court´s order removing a child from the child´s home shall be based upon a finding by that court that continuation in the home would be contrary to the welfare of the child. If the court places custody of the child in the Division of Family and Children Services of the Department of Human Resources, the court shall also determine as a finding of fact whether reasonable efforts were made by the Division of Family and Children Services of the Department of Human Resources and any other appropriate agencies to preserve and reunify families prior to the placement of a child in the custody of the Department of Human Resources, to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from that child´s home, and to make it possible for the child to return safely to the child´s home. Prior to being placed in foster care, the child shall be placed in a relative´s care unless there is no relative who is willing and able to care for the child. The Division of Family and Children Services of the Department of Human Resources must show that a registered letter, in addition to telephone calls and e-mails, requesting family placement was provided to each and every relative that the child or the parent, guardian, or custodian of such child provided to the Division of Family and Children Services of the Department of Human Resources upon the request of the Division of Family and Children Services of the Department of Human Resources and whether reasonable efforts were made to place the child in a relative´s home prior to the placement of that child in the custody of the Department of Human Resources. Such findings shall also be made at every subsequent review of the court´s order under this chapter.(1) In determining reasonable efforts to be made with respect to a child, as described in this subsection, and in making such reasonable efforts, the child´s health and safety shall be the paramount concern;(2) Except as provided in paragraph (4) of this subsection, reasonable efforts shall be made to preserve and reunify families:(A) Prior to the placement of a child in the custody of the Department of Human Resources, to prevent or eliminate the need for removing the child from the child´s home; and(B) To make it possible for a child to return safely to the child´s home;(3) If continuation of reasonable efforts of the type described in paragraph (2) of this subsection is determined to be inconsistent with the permanency plan for the child, reasonable efforts shall be made to place the child in a timely manner in accordance with the permanency plan and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child;(4) Reasonable efforts of the type described in paragraph (2) of this subsection shall not be required to be made with respect to a parent of a child if a court of competent jurisdiction has determined that:(A) The parent has subjected the child to aggravated circumstances which may include but need not be limited to abandonment, torture, chronic abuse, and sexual abuse; or(B) The parent has:(i) Committed murder of another child of the parent;(ii) Been convicted of the Committed murder of the other parent of the child;(iii) Committed voluntary manslaughter of another child of the parent;(iv) Aided or abetted, attempted, conspired, or solicited to commit murder or voluntary manslaughter of another child of the parent; or(v) Committed a felony assault that results in serious bodily injury to the child or another child of the parent; or(C) The parental rights of the parent to a sibling have been terminated involuntarily;(5) If reasonable efforts of the type described in paragraph (2) of this subsection are not made with respect to a child as a result of a determination made by a court of competent jurisdiction in accordance with paragraph (4) of this subsection:(A) A permanency hearing in accordance with subsection (o) of this Code section shall be held for the child within 30 days after such determination; and(B) Reasonable efforts shall be made to place the child in a timely manner in accordance with the permanency plan and to complete whatever steps are necessary to finalize the permanent placement of the child; and(6) Reasonable efforts to place a child for adoption or with a legal guardian may shall not be made concurrently with reasonable efforts of the type described in paragraph (2) of this subsection."
SECTION 4.Said chapter is further amended by revising Code Section 15-11-78, relating to exclusion of public from juvenile hearing and exceptions, as follows:"15-11-78.(a) Except as otherwise provided by subsection (b) of this Code section, the general public shall be excluded from hearings involving delinquency, deprivation, or unruliness. Only the parties, their counsel, witnesses, persons accompanying a party for his or her assistance, and any other persons as the court finds have a proper interest in the proceeding or in the work of the court may be admitted by the court. The court may temporarily exclude the child from the hearing except while allegations of his or her delinquency or unruly conduct are being heard.(b) The general public shall be admitted to:(1) An adjudicatory hearing involving an allegation of a designated felony pursuant to Code Section 15-11-63;(2) An adjudicatory hearing involving an allegation of delinquency brought in the interest of any child who has previously been adjudicated delinquent; provided, however, the court shall close any delinquency hearing on an allegation of sexual assault or any delinquency hearing at which any party expects to introduce substantial evidence related to matters of deprivation;(3) Any child support hearing;(4) Any hearing in a legitimation action filed pursuant to Code Section 19-7-22; or(5) At the court´s discretion, any dispositional hearing involving any proceeding under this article; or(6) Any deprivation hearing except upon the written application of the parents or guardian of the child or children who are the subject of the hearing."
SECTION 5.Said chapter is further amended by revising Code Section 15-11-94, relating to grounds for termination of parental rights, by adding a new subsection to read as follows:"(d) If the court does not find that a parent´s parental rights should be terminated, another action to terminate such parent´s parental rights shall not be brought unless the action relates to a new allegation or new information."
SECTION 6.Said chapter is further amended by revising Code Section 15-11-95, relating to petitions for termination of parental rights, by adding a new subsection to read as follows:"(e) In addition to the petition, a statement of rights shall be served on each parent whose parental rights are sought to be terminated which shall set forth in ordinary and concise language the rights of the parent provided pursuant to this chapter including, but not limited to, the right to discovery and to counsel. Such statement of rights shall be promulgated by the Department of Human Resources pursuant to rule and regulation."
SECTION 7.Said chapter is further amended by revising Code Section 15-11-100, relating to physical and mental evaluations, by designating the existing matter as subsection (a) and adding a new subsection (b) to read as follows:"(b) In all cases in which the termination of parental rights is sought, the parent whose parental rights are sought to be terminated shall, upon written request to the person or entity prosecuting the case having actual custody, control, or possession of the material to be produced, have full access to the following for inspection, copying, or photographing:(1) The names and last known addresses and telephone numbers of each witness to the occurrence or occurrences which form the basis of the allegations against such parent;(2) A copy of any written statement made by any witness that relates to the subject matter concerning the testimony of the witness that the person or entity prosecuting the case intends to call as a witness;(3) Transcriptions, recordings, and summaries of any oral statement of any witness, except the product of counsel;(4) Any scientific or other report which is intended to be introduced at the hearing or that pertains to physical evidence which is intended to be introduced;(5) Photographs and any physical evidence which are intended to be introduced at the hearing; and(6) Copies of any police incident report and supplemental report, if any, regarding the occurrence which forms the basis of the allegations.A request for discovery shall be complied with promptly and not later than 48 hours prior to the termination hearing except when later compliance is made necessary by the timing of the request. If the request for discovery is made fewer than 48 hours prior to the termination hearing, the discovery response shall be produced in a timely manner. If, subsequent to providing a discovery response in compliance with this Code section, the existence of additional evidence is found, it shall be promptly provided to the parent making the discovery request. If, at any time during the course of the proceedings, it is brought to the attention of the court that a person or entity has failed to comply with a discovery request pursuant to this subsection, the court may grant a continuance, prohibit the party from introducing in evidence the information not disclosed, or enter such other order as the court deems just under the circumstances."
SECTION 8.Chapter 8 of Title 19 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to adoptions, is amended by adding a new Code section to read as follows:"19-8-27.Neither the State of Georgia nor any of its agencies, departments, offices, authorities, or other instrumentalities shall apply for, obtain, receive, or accept any adoption incentive payments under the federal Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997, P.L. 105-89, 42 U.S.C. Section 673b, or any similar federal legislation providing incentive funds to the states for promoting adoptions."
SECTION 9.All laws and parts of laws in conflict with this Act are repealed.

Monday, May 19, 2008

WASHINGTON DC

I'm requesting to speak before ALL Senators to share my story in hopes that Laws can be changed. Met with officials to give briefing and now am requesting for Legislative proposals to be enacted. I am making contacts to obtaining backing and requesting full on investigations into activities. Contact me privately for resources.
Kathleen

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

The "Problem" with San Luis Obispo's CPS is "budget reform"

California: San Luis Obispo Grand Jury criticisms of CPSChild welfare report raises questions Grand jury's findings show problems need addressing
Tribune editorial The Tribune, San Luis Obispo Let's be clear about this: Child Welfare Services can be a lightning rod for emotions; the job of reassigning children from natural to foster families can be nothing short of heart-wrenching for all concerned. So it's not totally surprising that each time the county grand jury puts CWS under the microscope, something will come bubbling to the surface. Such was the situation when the grand jury released its report this week that addressed some of the complaints surrounding 17 cases overseen by CWS. In a nutshell, the grand jury found: - problems in reporting and investigating child abuse - problems in placing children who have been removed from their homes - communication problems between rank-and-file workers and upper management. Lee Collins, director of the county's Department of Social Services, which oversees the Child Welfare division, fairly fumed in his contempt for the findings: "In nearly 30 years in Social Services, I have never seen a court report that is this poorly researched, so riddled with factual errors and so replete with allegations that are wholly without foundation. It is, in my view, a shocking embarrassment to its authors." If Collins sounds testy, it's understandable. His department, one of the largest in the county, has taken budget hits amounting to millions of dollars over the last couple of years. Those dollars equate to hiring freezes, loss of personnel and increased caseloads in an already stretched-thin operation. The coming year calls for more cuts. So when this year's grand jury used 17 complaint-driven cases -- with CWS handling more than 900 active cases per month -- as its basis for its findings, Collins cried foul. "It's a little over the top to look at 17 cases and indict a whole program," he said, adding that a more random review of cases would have led to more accurate conclusions. We agree. However, because the Department of Social Services is financed largely through state and federal money, it's also bound by state and federal privacy restrictions. In short, as much as the grand jury would have liked to have access to other cases, it was limited to only those that involved complaints. We noted a year ago that Social Services seemed to be a department under siege. Several individuals had been arrested on embezzlement charges, some 130 department employees had held a meeting with management to discuss their concerns about how the department was being run, and two watchdog groups -- the Women's Community Center Family Law Action Committee and Forum on Abused Children & the System -- were alleging abuses within the child welfare system. We wondered at the time if some of these concerns weren't becoming ingrained patterns of protocol rather than isolated incidences. This year's grand jury report does little to assuage those concerns. Does the Department of Social Services need an independent oversight committee? One that can be sworn to uphold privacy as it randomly checks cases and operations? Or can Social Services' management address the problems and allegations that have dogged the department for the last several years? Finally, can these problems even be adequately addressed while budgets shrink and caseloads grow? Collins has 60 days to respond to the grand jury's findings. We'll keep our powder dry until that time.

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Child "Protection" Reform - Website exposing the TRUTH about CPS

http://projectcpsreform.50webs.com/ - Information about CPS and how YOU can help us educate others so we can reform this very broken system. CPS hurts more kids then they help. A child is 10 times more likely to be abused or die while in foster care. More than 70% would be better off with their loving parents. These children are supporting an agency that is not helping most children. The Federal Government is furnising funds but the number of children are increasing each year. This is due to Federal Grants and other incentives that CPS earns. This agency is "kidjacking" many children for PROFIT and are drugging them for more money. When does it stop? We need to tear down the wall and start all over again. Remember Berlin. IT CAN BE DONE. We need to start all over and build a system that will protect children. One that focuses on family and reunification. Not abuse or isolation from biological parents. We need CPS to go back to what was originally intended - TO HELP ABUSED AND NEGLECTED CHILDREN.

Join me in my efforts to REFORM CPS

Visit myspace at: www.myspace.com/osoluckyme
Videos: www.youtube.com/osoluckyme

Katheen Dearinger

Friday, May 2, 2008

Get your Justice if the Courts don't listen - EXPOSE EXPOSE EXPOSE CPS

We WILL be heard! Call in LIVE to get your justice. These guys will even investigate. BLOW THE WHISTLE IF YOU HAVE BEEN WRONGED BY CPS OR THE COURT

Click here: BlogTalkRadio - Justice 4 US - Injustices - courts, judges and things concerning the couts

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

San Luis Obispo Corruption

Sept 2004

California: DSS worker sentenced for embezzlementAccording to sources, the DSS worker named in this article is the same one that lied claiming not to have received Dr. Baughman's report in support of returning Diane Booth's son Vincent to her. -LJM Sisters sentenced for embezzlement
By: Amy Jacobs Two Central Coast women are headed to jail for embezzling thousands of dollars from the Department of Social Services in San Luis Obispo County. Angela Sanchez and her sister, Loretta Solano, pleaded guilty to embezzling more than $14,000. Prosecutors say Sanchez, a former employee of the department, and her sister took the money over a four-year period. "Sanchez was in a position to help those that were in the most need of our help in her role at the department of social services," says prosecutor Steve Von Dohlen. "But she and her sister manipulated this vital system for their own personal benefit." Investigators found the money was deposited into the bank accounts of both Sanchez and Solano, and records show that a significant amount of money was taken out of the accounts at an ATM machine at the Chumash Casino. "Her indication was that she was withdrawing money there not for use as fruits from the crime but instead to establish a record for future tax reporting purposes," says Von Dohlen. "What implications that may have down the road remain to be seen." Judge Michael Duffy told the women they betrayed the public trust, which is something the court takes very seriously. He sentenced Sanchez to 270 days in jail, while her sister will spend 90 days in jail, and both women also received five years probation. The sisters will serve their jail time separately; Loretta Solano will report to jail on October 1, and Angela Sanchez will start her sentence on December 30.

Sunday, April 27, 2008

WHY WON'T SAND LUIS OBISPO CPS LET JENNY GO? M-O-N-E-Y !!!

Well here you have it folks. M-O-N-E-Y. (cha -ching, cha-ching, cha-ching-cha-ching)

What drives CPS in San Luis Obispo to take children?

DOORS....and paper clip cuts....

The NEW "child abuse" of the future is DOORS and paper clips. That's right folks. CPS doesn't care about ABUSED or NEGLECTED children anymore. NO They care about DOORS. So don't damage your door. Never mind if your child is 16 and going through the normal "teenager" stage. CPS doesn't care. They don't even investigate before taking children. They don't check out the house or even the DOOR before taking your child. They don't interview the Mother. They only listen to spiteful ex-husbands who lie.

FACT:

FALSE ACUSATIONS make up MOST of the calls to CPS. They don't care who's life they ruin. They go on "Witch hunts" and try to destroy you within your own community. You are just supposed to "take it" and follow their "CASE PLAN". It doesn't matter that they tramatized you by taking your child or that you are now being thought of as a "bad" parent because your kid was out of control. NOOOO It doesn't matter that you are now being talked about by your neighbors and other parents who send you nasty emails accusing you of being CRAZY. The school thinks you are bad too. You are ostrocized every where you go. You are placed into a central REGISTRY for Child abusers - EVEN THOUGH YOU DIDN'T ABUSE YOUR CHILD!

No one would believe you if you told them the "real" story. The TRUTH. You know why? CPS hides behind their "real mission". CPS is really "Child Punishment Services".

CPS manipulate everyone in the "system"; their little circle - all in the name of "child abuse" prevention. All under the disguise of "helping" children. What CPS REALLY does is downright scary. They alienate children from their parents. They turn the child against their parents. They make them a prisioner. They make them afraid. They screw them up in the head. OUR JAIL POPULATION MAKES UP 50-70% OF PREVIOUS FOSTER KIDS. Why is that?
CPS DOESN'T REALLY WANT THE ABUSED CHILDREN. No. They send them back to their abusive homes. What they really want is cute blond teenagers who are happy and well adjusted. They'll take them and screw them up - then MAYBE they'll send them home if they can't adopt them out and get TITLE IV FUNDS. Yup. that's right! State and Federal funds. Incentives for stealing YOUR child! Keep your children home people. HOME SCHOOL!

YOU ARE GUILTY EVEN IF YOU DIDN'T DO ANYTHING TO DESERVE TO LOSE YOUR CHILD!

WARNING TO ALL PARENTS:

Do NOT damage your own DOOR to your own house. At least not here in San Luis Obispo. They take children away for this serious offense. To CPS in San Luis Obispo damaging doors is a CRIME that carrys a stiff bail of $100,000 fine. Jeez for that kind of money you can "almost" BUY" your own Social Worker!!

Now WALLS are ok. They haven't written a section in the Law yet that states you can't knock holes in your own wall. Just make sure the wall is not near the child's door because that could be constued as being too close to the door....oops I mean the child.

So remember
DOORS = NO
WALLS = YES.

Got it?

WHAT IS OUR GOVERNMENT COMING TO? WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?

Picture of door soon to be released.

DISCLOSURE:
Due to the "sexual content" on this DOOR viewers are advised to use "caution" when viewing as this is a "teenager's bedroom door" . This DOOR is NOT G-Rated. It is not recommended for those under the age 18.

CPS makes kids mentally unstable for PROFIT. They alienate them from good Mothers. They brainwash them. CPS steals kids for State and Federal funds. CPS kills children every year. Abolish CPS

HANG ON HONEY! THE GOVENOR WILL HELP US! HAVE FAITH IN ME!

l_4492245cb743f63becd4f60caec42bde m_aed84ebd0f0f857eee31bad00c63bcd6

Saturday, April 26, 2008

READY!!

CPS WILL GET REFORMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Saturday, April 5, 2008

LINKS TO CHECK OUT:

www.fightcps.com/

http://fightcps.com/pdf/TheCorruptBusinessOfChildProtectiveServices.pdf - State Legislator Speaks out agains CPS & corruption. GREAT!

www.legallykidnapped.blogspot.com/2008/02/mass-cps-corruption.html

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080130211447AAoBT0C - You tube FACTS

www.legallykidnapped.blogspot.com/2007/11/corrupt-business-of-child-protective.html

http://almosttuesday.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/you-know-youre-a-corrupt-judge-when/

http://www.squidoo.com/abolishcps

http://www.freewebs.com/voiceofwomen/
GOD WATCHES OVER THE CHILDREN
www.godwatchesoverthechildren.org
Extensive documentation of CPS/Foster care abuses

FIGHT CPS
www.fightcps.com

PARENTS WHO CARE COALITION
Deb Phillips West River Coordinator
Phone: (605) 641-3004
pwcc@rushmore.com
Naomi Johnson
Rapid City Coordinator
Phone: (605) 341-3209
Cell: (605) 391-9539
spindr4015@aol.com
http://www.freewebs.com/parentswhocarecoalition

AMERICAN FAMILY RIGHTS ASSOCIATION
This site has a wealth of nationwide information!
www.familyrightsassociation.com

NATIONAL COALITION ON CHILD PROTECTION REFORM
Great site!
www.nccpr.org

NATIONAL INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ASSOCIATON
www.nicwa.org

THE DEFENSE FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN
www.defensefoundationforchildren.com

EDUCATE YOURSELF
This site has plenty of information about the BIG picture..
www.educate-yourself.org

THE DRUDGE REPORT
News from all major media sources.
www.drudgereport.com
Visit some of our friends...
www.patohoffmann.net
www.makoche.com
www.dakotadrum.com
www.anniehumphrey.com
www.oyateunderground.com

EMANCIPATE FORM - California
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/forms/fillable/mc300.pdf

DEFINITIONS OF ABUSE AND NEGLECT

Definitions of Child Abuse and NeglectState Statutes Series
Author(s): Child Welfare Information Gateway
Year Published: 2007
Current through April 2007
You may wish to review this introductory text to better understand the information contained in your State's statute. To see how your State addresses this issue, visit the State Statutes Search.
Child abuse and neglect are defined by Federal and State laws. The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) is the Federal legislation that provides minimum standards that States must incorporate in their statutory definitions of child abuse and neglect. The CAPTA definition of "child abuse and neglect" refers to:
"Any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker, which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse, or exploitation, or an act or failure to act which presents an imminent risk of serious harm"1
The CAPTA definition of "sexual abuse" includes:
"The employment, use, persuasion, inducement, enticement, or coercion of any child to engage in, or assist any other person to engage in, any sexually explicit conduct or simulation of such conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of such conduct; or
The rape, and in cases of caretaker or interfamilial relationships, statutory rape, molestation, prostitution, or other form of sexual exploitation of children, or incest with children"2
Types of Abuse
All States, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands provide definitions of child abuse and neglect in statute. As applied to reporting statutes, these definitions determine the grounds for State intervention in the protection of a child's well-being.3 States recognize the different types of abuse in their definitions, including physical abuse, neglect, sexual abuse, and emotional abuse. Some States also provide definitions in statute for parental substance abuse and/or for abandonment as child abuse.
Physical Abuse
Physical abuse is generally defined as "any nonaccidental physical injury to the child" and can include striking, kicking, burning, or biting the child, or any action that results in a physical impairment of the child. In approximately 36 States and American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, the definition of abuse also includes acts or circumstances that threaten the child with harm or create a substantial risk of harm to the child's health or welfare.4
Neglect
Neglect is frequently defined in terms of deprivation of adequate food, clothing, shelter, medical care, or supervision. Approximately 21 States and American Samoa, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands include failure to educate the child as required by law in their definition of neglect.5 Seven States further define medical neglect as failing to provide any special medical treatment or mental health care needed by the child.6 In addition, four States define as medical neglect the withholding of medical treatment or nutrition from disabled infants with life-threatening conditions.7
Sexual Abuse/Exploitation
All States include sexual abuse in their definitions of child abuse. Some States refer in general terms to sexual abuse, while others specify various acts as sexual abuse. Sexual exploitation is an element of the definition of sexual abuse in most jurisdictions. Sexual exploitation includes allowing the child to engage in prostitution or in the production of child pornography.
Emotional Abuse
All States and territories except Georgia and Washington include emotional maltreatment as part of their definitions of abuse or neglect. Approximately 22 States, the District of Columbia, the Northern Mariana Islands, and Puerto Rico provide specific definitions of emotional abuse or mental injury to a child.8 Typical language used in these definitions is "injury to the psychological capacity or emotional stability of the child as evidenced by an observable or substantial change in behavior, emotional response, or cognition," or as evidenced by "anxiety, depression, withdrawal, or aggressive behavior."
Parental Substance Abuse
Parental substance abuse is an element of the definition of child abuse or neglect in some States.9 Circumstances that are considered abuse or neglect in some States include:
Prenatal exposure of a child to harm due to the mother's use of an illegal drug or other substance10
Manufacture of a controlled substance in the presence of a child or on the premises occupied by a child11
Allowing a child to be present where the chemicals or equipment for the manufacture of controlled substances are used or stored12
Selling, distributing, or giving drugs or alcohol to a child13
Use of a controlled substance by a caregiver that impairs the caregiver's ability to adequately care for the child14
Abandonment
Many States and territories now provide definitions for child abandonment in their reporting laws. Approximately 18 States and the District of Columbia include abandonment in their definition of abuse or neglect.15 Approximately 13 States, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands provide separate definitions for establishing abandonment.16 In general, it is considered abandonment of the child when the parent's identity or whereabouts are unknown, the child has been left by the parent in circumstances in which the child suffers serious harm, or the parent has failed to maintain contact with the child or to provide reasonable support for a specified period of time.
Standards for Reporting
The standards for what constitutes an abusive act vary among the States. Many States define abuse in terms of harm or threatened harm to a child's health or welfare. Other standards commonly seen include "acts or omissions," "recklessly fails or refuses to act," "willfully causes or permits," and "failure to provide." These standards guide mandatory reporters in deciding whether to make a report to child protective services.
Persons Responsible for the Child
In addition to defining acts or omissions that constitute child abuse or neglect, several States' statutes provide specific definitions of persons who can be reported to child protective services as perpetrators of abuse or neglect. These are persons who have some relationship or regular responsibility for the child. This generally includes parents, guardians, foster parents, relatives, or other caregivers responsible for the child's welfare.
Exceptions
A number of States provide exceptions in their reporting laws that exempt certain acts or omissions from their statutory definitions of child abuse and neglect. For instance, in 11 States and the District of Columbia, financial inability to provide for a child is exempted from the definition of neglect.17 In 14 States, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands, physical discipline of a child, as long as it is reasonable and causes no bodily injury to the child, is an exception to the definition of abuse.18
The CAPTA amendments of 1996 added new provisions specifying that nothing in the Act be construed as establishing a Federal requirement that a parent or legal guardian provide any medical service or treatment that is against the religious beliefs of the parent or legal guardian (42 U.S.C. § 5106i). At the State level, civil child abuse reporting laws may provide an exception to the definition of child abuse and neglect for parents who choose not to seek medical care for their children due to religious beliefs. Approximately 30 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Guam provide for such an exception.19 Three States specifically provide an exception for Christian Science treatment.20 However, 16 of the 30 States and Puerto Rico authorize the court to order medical treatment for the child when the child's condition warrants intervention.21 Five States require mandated reporters to report instances when a child is not receiving medical care so that an investigation can be made.22
To see how your State addresses this issue, visit the State Statutes Search.
To find information on all of the States and territories, view the complete printable PDF, Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect: Summary of State Laws (PDF - 442 KB).
1 42 U.S.C.A. § 5106g(2) (West Supp. 1998). back2 42 U.S.C.A. § 5106g(4) (West Supp. 1998). back3 The term "child" means a person who has not attained age 18. back4 The States are Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. In addition, Arizona, Kansas, New Hampshire, Washington, and the District of Columbia address the issue of risk of harm in their definitions of neglect. back5 The word approximately is used to stress the fact that the States frequently amend their laws. This information is current only through April 2007. The States that define "failure to educate" as neglect include Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota, West Virginia, and Wyoming. back6 Mississippi, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, and West Virginia. back7 Indiana, Kansas, Minnesota, and Montana. back8 Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. back9 For a more complete discussion of this issue, see Child Welfare Information Gateway's Parental Drug Use as Child Abuse. back10 Arkansas, Colorado, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. back11 Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Montana, Ohio, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, and Washington. back12 Arizona, New Mexico, and Washington. back13 Arkansas, Florida, Guam, Hawaii, Illinois, Minnesota, Ohio, and Texas. back14 Kentucky, New York, Rhode Island, and Texas. back15 Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming. back16 Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Maine, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, and South Carolina. back17 Arkansas, Florida, Kansas, Louisiana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. back18 Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, Texas, and Washington. back19 Alabama, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia, and Wyoming. back20 Arizona, Connecticut, and Washington. back21 Alabama, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania. back22 Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and Oklahoma. back
This publication is a product of the State Statutes Series prepared by Child Welfare Information Gateway. While every attempt has been made to be as complete as possible, additional information on these topics may be in other sections of a State's code as well as agency regulations, case law, and informal practices and procedures.

CPS VIOLATIONS

CPS VIOLATIONS - per attorney who suggests obtaining a Civil rights attorney and suing CPS!

· Welfare Institution Code 827 was violated

· NO Protective Custody warrant was ever filed before my daughter was removed from her school

· My daughter was removed because she didn’t want to see the therapist CPS arranged for her who was trying to get her to believe she was abused and neglected.

· CPS took my daughter without a warrant. This is a FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATION.

· The California State statues of ABUSE or NEGLECT do NOT apply in our case. My daughter was NOT in “imminent risk of serious bodily injury” at any time or when she was removed 30 days later.

· 14 Amendment Federal Laws were violated. Right to familial Association

· My daughter’s and my Confidentiality was breached by CPS when they faxed documents to my new physician without my consent.

· CPS is in Contempt of court for lying under oath

· CPS is in contempt for the fabrication of court documents; intentionally misleading the court.

· CPS Unlawfully kidnapped my daughter; I believe with the intent to profit

· CPS withheld information from the court; including the fact that I was too sick to attend hearings


MORE VIOLATIONS WILL BE POSTED AS DISCOVERY IS MADE AVAILABLE

Letter to State Legislator - My story

Dear State Legislator XXXXXXX (link to letter will be added soon),

I read your investigation of CPS with great interest because I myself am stuck in the democracy that destroys family's here in California. CPS is corrupt and they manipulate the entire "system" from Judges to attornies to therapists to foster parents to children to doctors. I have seen first hand each of these intricacies first hand.

I will tell this story "condensed" because I am sure you have had TONS of emails due to your investigation. GOD BLESS YOU!!

Here goes:
My daughter is (was) a normal 16 1/2 year old teenager. She is a little bit hyperactive (ADHD) but she's my pride and joy and is beautiful to me. She is my only child. I am Kathleen and I'm 44 years old. I've raised my daughter ALONE since "Jenny" was 7 months old. I had little or no child support from the Father who was in and out of our lives (mostly out). The Father always had a problem paying child support and would lie about his income and vowed never to pay the arrearages he owed. All he was ordered to pay was 275/mo for our daughter. He is very spiteful. We have had 2 custody battles. Each time I prevailed. Through the years I attempted to help the Father and even moved him onto my ranch and gave him a home. I hired him to work for my mini storage business; even moving him into my personal residence so that he would be a father to our daughter.

The thanks I get:

After the last custody battle the Father moved away (again) to Iowa. My daughter reached 16 and began to act like a teenager; normal issues and experimenting with alcohol. I never allowed alcohol in my home or allowed my daughter to run wild. I don't drink or use drugs. When my daughter began dating a boy I disapproved of she began skipping school for several months. I was very sick with anemia during this time, but I did my best to parent her during that time. One night my daughter and I were to go christmas shopping and a fight ensued. She kicked me and I had an asthma attack. I flung a rabbit cage her direction to fend her off and it apparantly hit her leg. She was out of control; calling me names and locking her bedroom door. It was the worst fight we had ever had. I lost it and I damaged her bedroom door and then left the house. My daughter called 911 and the following day the police arrested me and I had a 100,000 bail. I had to pay 10,000 for that door. A door to a house I paid for. I did not abuse my daughter. I feel bad about the fight and I even tried to call my daughter after I went shopping but the officer wouldn't let her answer the phone. The officer made a false report and contrived a story that included me running from the scene to avoid arrest, but this is completely false. After I bailed out I discoverred that CPS took my daughter. They returned her 3 days later and I thought that was the end of CPS.

A month later they took my daughter from my home for no reason and she is now in the system. The father has told CPS a bunch of lies about me because he's hoping he will gain custody of our daughter. I told the worker that I don't drink often and I don't do drugs but she told me I was lying. I was sent to Drug and alcohol and they determined I was not a drunk. I was taking pain medicine for my back and I had a prescription but I did not abuse my medicine. I have spina bifida. I am no longer taking this medicine because CPS lied to the court and made me appear to be a drug addict.

CPS has done alot of horrible things to me. They have faxed documents to doctors so they will ruin my medical file. I did not sign any medical release. The counselor had contact with the CPS worker and I did not authorize this either. The Drug and alcohol gave incorrect information to the Social worker and both my attorney's misrepresented my case before the Judge. I have tried to get a parent advocate but the only one works at my school and I am hoping she will help. It is doubtful because it sounds like she is speaking to the social workers. I basically have nowhere left to turn for help. The foster mother tells me and my daughter she is neglected.Nothing could be further from the truth and I believe she is brainwashing my daughter. My daughter has everything she could ever want and I've taken her all over the world. She had credit cards by the time she was 12 years old and is even a bit spoiled, The foster mother on the other hand sent her own children to live with their father so she supports my daughter living with her dad. She does not know our background or the fact that my ex was in our lives for 5 years before we moved to this county 2 years ago. Certainly if my daughter was neglected then both parents would be guilty. I'm sure she will tell the social worker her beliefs and the fact that she is paid over 2,000 per month to "babysit" my child would give her good cause to make this kind of a statement. I feel all of this is very damaging to my daughter who now tells me she is becoming "bullemic". Jenny is depressed because she's been held hostage for 3 months now with no end in sight. CPS is doing everything in their power to make me look bad. They are now going and interviewing people; my daughters friends, parents, etc and looking for dirt on me. I dont know anyone in this town and I haven't done anything wrong. If I discovered alcohol I reported it and called the parents. I was a responsible and concerned parent to my daughter and CPS is attempting to humiliate me and ruin my life. I have no where else to turn and I can't stay in this town after what they have done to me mentally and spiritually and my daugther wants to leave this county because she is traumatized by this experience. I am selling everything and I am walking away from our home. CPS did NOT have the right to destroy our lives. Will you please be a voice and help me because I have no where else to turn? Do you have any contacts or anyone who can help me with this situation?

These are the people who are doing this injustice to me and my daughter:

CPS MAIN NUMBER 805-781-1825 Leland Collins (president)Lindsey Buckingham (corrupt) not sure (call main #)Mark Hass (corrupt) 805-781-1801Current social worker - Louise Tobin 805-237-3181 (not sure about her but I think she's corrupt)Drug & Alcohol-Rebecca - 805-461-6038 (pretty sure she's going to twist things due to past report inaccuracies)Foster Mom (Jill) 805-461-9303 (or 466, not sure)There's alot more of this story but this is most of it. Please let me know if you would like to see documents of what they are doing. Please tell me what your role will be, if any, to reform CPS. There are MANY MANY people just like me screaming for some sort of reform. Our children are suffering at the hands of CPS. They are destroying families every single day.I know this is a money making venture for them but they need to realize what they are doing to our childen and their future. I have done nothing that I should be embarassed about. I did my best and I believe I did a good job raising my daughter. CPS had no right to take jenny. I have read the State Laws and she should not be where she is. I am low on money and on resources so please help me because my previious attorney is drafting up a document for me to release my parental rights.The prior attorney told me not to go to court on the day custody was given to the State of California.

GOD BLESS you for listening to my story and to the many others who have been victims of CPS. I would appreciate ANYTHING you could do for me. A phone call, a letter, anything. I love my daughter and I miss my best friend.

Sincerely yours,
Kathleen M. Dearinger
San Luis Obispo, CA:
805-461-5338
805-704-6779

websites: (pictures of me and my daughter and more information). I'm still working on my websites.
www.cpscorruption.blogspot.com
www.myspace.com/osoluckyme