WARNING: CRIME ALERT! CPS "Child Protection Services" is kidnapping children! Stop Organized Crime! View San Luis Obispo Children Non Profits: http://www.box.net/shared/cnp6fok9i8 View your county: visit: www.guidestar.com
Sunday, August 31, 2008
Saturday, August 30, 2008
Friday, August 29, 2008
A child pornography bust that led to the arrests of three local residents sends shock waves across the Central Coast.
Here are the Facts First:
* Arrests were made throughout the state Tuesday.
* Computer hard drives containing graphic images of young children were taken as evidence.
* FBI agents said the suspects were using peer-to-peer computer networking sites to exchange the images.
TAKE ACTION: Sexual Predators
Resources on KSBY.com
More than 50 men were busted for allegedly producing and possessing child pornography. Among the suspects are three men from the Central Coast:
* 47-year-old Bryan Goossens, a former San Luis Obispo County sheriff's deputy
* 30-year-old Jeremy Neubauer of Nipomo, who was indicted in late June
* 41 year-old Bryan David Arnold of Grover Beach
Grover Beach residents were shocked when they heard someone from their city was busted for possessing child porn. People who live near Arnold still can't their neighbor is one of the men accused.
"It's very disturbing, yeah. It's a terrible thing," said Grover Beach resident Beth Hollands.
Of particular concern to the neighbors is the fact that several families with young children call this neighborhood home.
Hollands said, "I just don't understand that, you know, about children and about people, grown ups and the children thing. You know, when it comes to the pornography thing. I never could understand that."
Hollands has lived in her Grover Beach neighborhood for more than eight years. She admits she doesn't know her neighbors as well as she would like, adding, "You don't know people a lot of the times when it comes to things like that."
Dee Peterson feels the same way, and has some very strong opinions about the situation.
"Put them away in jail and keep them there - not release them in six months or two or three years, keep them there. Those people will do it again. They don't change," said Peterson.
Several neighbors Action News talked with Wednesday said they were simply too upset about the matter to go on camera with us.
The eight-month long child porn investigation focused on Internet file sharing sites, called peer-to-peer networks.
Peer-to-peer sites allow a group of users with the same networking program to connect with each other and directly access files from each other's hard drives.
Investigators said those sites are quickly becoming a place where people can go to obtain and exchange pornographic material.
Tuesday's bust was the first undercover operation in the nation that used peer-to-peer Internet networking to find people suspected of producing or possessing child pornography.
The former sheriff's deputy arrested on child pornography charges, Bryan Goossens, started out as a corrections officer.
Action News spoke to someone who knew Goossens, and is surprised at his arrest. The acquaintance asked not to be identified.
Asked how he knew Goossens, the acquaintance replied, "Well, we played softball together and against each other...I saw him 10 or 20 days out of the year. I talked with him every time I saw him. I thought he was a nice guy. Well, he seemed just like a normal guy, hardworking, worked for the sheriff's, you know, was married at the time, had some children."
Action News asked the anonymous acquaintance what his reaction was when he heard the news of Goossens' arrest.
"It was utter disbelief. I thought that it was some kind of a mistake, because it's hard to imagine somebody could be that different in private than they are in their public life. I really had no idea that, you know, especially someone in law enforcement would be capable of this," replied Goossens' acquaintance.
"I'm glad that if it is true and they did catch him, and he needs to be severely punished for it," the acquaintance added.
OPINION: Pity the children, not the porn fan
No Tags Currently Defined
By KAREN VELIE
Not a lot shocks me anymore. Even so, I am stunned by the number of blog posters and media reporters who worry that people accused of child porn, once convicted, will be unable to get their lives back on track.
The facts, however, suggest that a great percentage of these people have been way off track for a long time and stand little chance of ever changing.
Recent local arrests were preceded by lengthy, intensive investigations, officials said. Former San Luis Obispo Sheriff’s Deputy Bryan Goossens and part-time postman Jeremy Neubauer are battling charges of child pornography following a widespread roundup of suspected members of a child pornography ring. A third county man, Bryan Arnold, will be arraigned September 8.
Some people believe that child pornography is mainly about lonely men getting turned on by 16-year old Victoria Secret models who look 25. They think that a quick peek is all that is needed for the authorities to sweep in and make an arrest. The label of sex offender is then forever attached.
Nothing could be farther from the truth, and many investigators in this field believe “the media just doesn’t get it.” Not the severity of the crimes, nor the rapidly expanding frequency.
“We are not talking about someone inadvertently stumbling across a Web site,” said United States Attorney's Office Public Affairs Officer Thom Mrozek. “People we prosecute are collectors. They have hundreds or thousands of images stored on their computers or CD ROMs. And we are not talking about teenagers in swim suits. We are talking about images of graphic sexual contact.”
Federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) spokesperson Virginia Kice said the kind of child pornography that results in prosecution “is about infants and young children being sadistically abused, bondage, and bestiality. Many of these men also act out their fantasies with children.”
Though experts don’t agree on the exact percentage of child porn fans who also molest children, the figures are shockingly high. A Mayo Institute study conservatively estimates 76 percent of child porn enthusiasts also take a hands on approach. A 2007 government study reports that 85 percent of men convicted of downloading internet porn admitted to prison psychologists that they also sexually abused children.
One perspective is that exposure to child pornography fuels sexual urges, and that a constant barrage of sadistic images allows these men to feel their urges are not only “normal” but that they somehow “fit in.”
Even so, time and time again, those accused of child porn claim they only glanced at the materials, or were doing it for research purposes.
You have to look no farther than the media outrage at the child porn conviction of San Francisco radio host Bernie Ward. Numerous major newspaper articles lay blame on an “unjust system” for Ward’s impending five to 10 year sentence for actions he claims were research-oriented. The stories fail to mention that he downloaded graphic videos of young children being sadistically abused, and then passed those on to other child porn enthusiasts.
“It’s not about clicking on an image, it is downloading child porn,” Kice added. “A lot of child porn is produced in the United States, but we want to protect children around the globe, wherever a child is being abused.”
In the 80s, acquiring child porn was a dangerous and expensive venture, with the postal service playing watchdog. The Internet has provided an easily accessible -- and cheap -- venue to a rapidly-morphing child porn industry. Victims are increasingly younger in age, studies show: 91 percent of the victims are under 12, and 80 percent of the victims are female.
With the volume of Internet porn literally doubling every year, this crime has risen to the top of the priority list for many criminal investigators.
Within the past few weeks, apart from the 55 Central and Southern California child porn arrests, a Fresno man was convicted of kidnapping a 12-year-old and making videos of his sexual assaults. And a San Antonio woman advertised her 5-year-old daughter as a “nice piece” in an attempt to trade the child for a car and a new home.
“The demand for these pictures drives the industry,” said FBI spokeswoman Laura Eimiller “We try to educate the public that it is a serious crime.”
FBI busts sheriff’s deputy Goossens for child porn
No Tags Currently Defined
By DANIEL BLACKBURN and KAREN VELIE
San Luis Obispo County Deputy Sheriff Bryan Goossens was arrested Monday by federal agents as part of a widespread roundup of suspected members of a child pornography ring. Two other county men also have been named and face charges.
Officials said the suspects used the Internet to trade photographs.
Goossens, who caused a five-car accident in Atascadero in July, was one of more than 50 people in southern and central California whose arrests or indictments are being announced later this morning by a multi-agency task force in Los Angeles. (Additional details will be posted on this site later this morning.)
FBI spokeswoman Laura Eimiller said Jeremy Neubauer, 29, of Nipomo, a part-time postal employee, also was arrested Monday. The identity of the third person was not immediately available.
A 20-year employee of the sheriff’s department, Goossens was taken into custody and transported to Los Angeles for booking in a federal detention facility. It was unclear if he had yet posted bail Tuesday morning. Goossens has been on paid administrative leave since July 11. FBI agents seized a computer and other items recently from Goossens' home.
Following the July 19 vehicle incident in which Goossens’ pickup truck sideswiped and totaled four parked cars before rolling over twice, Atascadero police investigators routed their report through other-than-normal channels. As a result, the spectacular 9:15 a.m. collision nearly escaped public attention. Police did not cite the suspended deputy. No media in San Luis Obispo County reported on the accident except UncoveredSLO.com.
Goossens was hired in 1988 and had been assigned to patrol duty at the sheriff’s Templeton office. He spent three years working as a corrections officer before becoming a deputy in 1991.
last edited on August 19th, 2008 at 9:34 AM
Thursday, August 28, 2008
DSS and affiliates rewarded for breaking up families
Child "protection" is one of the biggest businesses in the country. We spend over $30 billion a year on it.
The money goes to tens of thousands of a) state employees, b) collateral professionals, such as lawyers, court personnel, court investigators, evaluators and guardians, judges, and c) DSS contracted vendors such as counselors, therapists, more "evaluators", junk psychologists, residential facilities, foster parents, adoptive parents, MSPCC, Big Brothers/Big Sisters, YMCA, etc. This newspaper is not big enough to list all of the people in this state who have a job, draw a paycheck, or make their profits off the kids in DSS custody.
In this article I explain the financial infrastructure that provides the motivation for DSS to take people’s children – and not give them back.
In 1974 Walter Mondale promoted the Child Abuse and Prevention Act which began feeding massive amounts of federal funding to states to set up programs to combat child abuse and neglect. From that came Child "Protective" Services, as we know it today. After the bill passed, Mondale himself expressed concerns that it could be misused. He worried that it could lead states to create a "business" in dealing with children.
Then in 1997 President Clinton passed the "Adoption and Safe Families Act." The public relations campaign promoted it as a way to help abused and neglected children who languished in foster care for years, often being shuffled among dozens of foster homes, never having a real home and family. In a press release from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services dated November 24, 1999, it refers to "President Clinton’s initiative to double by 2002 the number of children in foster care who are adopted or otherwise permanently placed."
It all sounded so heartwarming. We, the American public, are so easily led. We love to buy stereotypes; we just eat them up, no questions asked. But, my mother, bless her heart, taught me from the time I was young to "consider the source." In the stereotype that we’ve been sold about kids in foster care, we picture a forlorn, hollow-eyed child, thin and pale, looking up at us beseechingly through a dirt streaked face. Unconsciously, we pull up old pictures from Life magazine of children in Appalachia in the 1930s. We think of orphans and children abandoned by parents who look like Manson family members. We play a nostalgic movie in our heads of the little fellow shyly walking across an emerald green, manicured lawn to meet Ward and June Cleaver, his new adoptive parents, who lead him into their lovely suburban home. We imagine the little tyke’s eyes growing as big as saucers as the Cleavers show him his very own room, full of toys and sports gear. And we just feel so gosh darn good about ourselves.
Now it’s time to wake up to the reality of the adoption business.
Very few children who are being used to supply the adoption market are hollow-eyed tykes from Appalachia. Very few are crack babies from the projects. [Oh… you thought those were the children they were saving? Think again]. When you are marketing a product you have to provide a desirable product that sells. In the adoption business that would be nice kids with reasonably good genetics who clean up good. An interesting point is that the Cape Cod & Islands office leads the state in terms of processing kids into the system and having them adopted out. More than the inner city areas, the projects, Mission Hill, Brockton, Lynn, etc. Interesting…
With the implementation of the Adoption and Safe Families Act, President Clinton tried to make himself look like a humanitarian who is responsible for saving the abused and neglected children. The drive of this initiative is to offer cash "bonuses" to states for every child they have adopted out of foster care, with the goal of doubling their adoptions by 2002, and sustaining that for each subsequent year. They actually call them "adoption incentive bonuses," to promote the adoption of children.
Where to Find the Children
A whole new industry was put into motion. A sweet marketing scheme that even Bill Gates could envy. Now, if you have a basket of apples, and people start giving you $100 per apple, what are you going to do? Make sure that you have an unlimited supply of apples, right?
The United States Department of Health & Human Services administers Child Protective Services. To accompany the ASF Act, the President requested, by executive memorandum, an initiative entitled Adoption 2002, to be implemented and managed by Health & Human Services. The initiative not only gives the cash adoption bonuses to the states, it also provides cash adoption subsidies to adoptive parents until the children turn eighteen.
Everybody makes money. If anyone really believes that these people are doing this out of the goodness of their hearts, then I’ve got some bad news for you. The fact that this program is run by HHS, ordered from the very top, explains why the citizens who are victims of DSS get no response from their legislators. It explains why no one in the Administration cares about the abuse and fatalities of children in the "care" of DSS, and no one wants to hear about the broken arms, verbal abuse, or rapes. They are just business casualties. It explains why the legislators I’ve talked to for the past three years look at me with pity. Because I’m preaching to the already damned.
The legislators have forgotten who funds their paychecks and who they need to account to, as has the Governor. Because it isn’t the President. It’s us.
How DSS Is Helped
The way that the adoption bonuses work is that each state is given a baseline number of expected adoptions based on population.
For every child that DSS can get adopted, there is a bonus of $4,000 to $6,000.
But that is just the starting figure in a complex mathematical formula in which each bonus is multiplied by the percentage that the state has managed to exceed its baseline adoption number. The states must maintain this increase in each successive year. [Like compound interest.] The bill reads: "$4,000 to $6,000 will be multiplied by the amount (if any) by which the number of foster child adoptions in the State exceeds the base number of foster child adoptions for the State for the fiscal year." In the "technical assistance" section of the bill it states that, "the Secretary [of HHS] may, directly or through grants or contracts, provide technical assistance to assist states and local communities to reach their targets for increased numbers of adoptions for children in foster care." The technical assistance is to support "the goal of encouraging more adoptions out of the foster care system; the development of best practice guidelines for expediting the termination of parental rights; the development of special units and expertise in moving children toward adoption as a permanent goal; models to encourage the fast tracking of children who have not attained 1 year of age into pre-adoptive placements; and the development of programs that place children into pre-adoptive placements without waiting for termination of parental rights."
In the November press release from HHS it continues, " HHS awarded the first ever adoption bonuses to States for increases in the adoption of children from the public foster care system." Some of the other incentives offered are "innovative grants" to reduce barriers to adoption [i.e., parents], more State support for adoptive families, making adoption affordable for families by providing cash subsides and tax credits.
A report from a private think tank, the National Center for Policy Analysis, reads: "The way the federal government reimburses States rewards a growth in the size of the program instead of the effective care of children." Another incentive being promoted is the use of the Internet to make adoption easier. Clinton directed HHS to develop an Internet site to "link children in foster care with adoptive families." So we will be able to window shop for children on a government web site. If you don’t find anything you like there, you can surf on over to the "Adopt Shoppe."
If you prefer to actually be able to kick tires instead of just looking at pictures you could attend one of DSS’s quaint "Adoption Fairs," where live children are put on display and you can walk around and browse. Like a flea market to sell kids. If one of them begs you to take him home you can always say, "Sorry. Just looking." The incentives for government child snatching are so good that I’m surprised we don’t have government agents breaking down people’s doors and just shooting the parents in the heads and grabbing the kids. But then, if you need more apples you don’t chop down your apple trees.
Benefits for Foster Parents
That covers the goodies the State gets. Now let’s have a look at how the Cleavers make out financially after the adoption is finalized.
After the adoption is finalized, the State and federal subsidies continue. The adoptive parents may collect cash subsidies until the child is 18. If the child stays in school, subsidies continue to the age of 22. There are State funded subsidies as well as federal funds through the Title IV-E section of the Social Security Act. The daily rate for State funds is the same as the foster care payments, which range from $410-$486 per month per child. Unless the child can be designated "special needs," which of course, they all can.
According to the NAATRIN State Subsidy profile from DSS, "special needs" may be defined as: "Physical disability, mental disability, emotional disturbance; a significant emotional tie with the foster parents where the child has resided with the foster parents for one or more years and separation would adversely affect the child’s development if not adopted by them." [But their significant emotional ties with their parents, since birth, never enter the equation.]
Additional "special needs" designations are: a child twelve years of age or older; racial or ethnic factors; child having siblings or half-siblings. In their report on the State of the Children, Boston’s Institute for Children says: "In part because the States can garner extra federal funds for special needs children the designation has been broadened so far as to become meaningless." "Special needs" children may also get an additional Social Security check.
The adoptive parents also receive Medicaid for the child, a clothing allowance and reimbursement for adoption costs such as adoption fees, court and attorney fees, cost of adoption home study, and "reasonable costs of food and lodging for the child and adoptive parents when necessary to complete the adoption process." Under Title XX of the Social Security Act adoptive parents are also entitled to post adoption services "that may be helpful in keeping the family intact," including "daycare, specialized daycare, respite care, in-house support services such as housekeeping, and personal care, counseling, and other child welfare services". [Wow! Everything short of being knighted by the Queen!]
The subsidy profile actually states that it does not include money to remodel the home to accommodate the child. But, as subsidies can be negotiated, remodeling could possibly be accomplished under the "innovative incentives to remove barriers to adoption" section. The subsidy regulations read that "adoption assistance is based solely on the needs of the child without regard to the income of the family." What an interesting government policy when compared to the welfare program that the same child’s mother may have been on before losing her children, and in which she may not own anything, must prove that she has no money in the bank; no boats, real estate, stocks or bonds; and cannot even own a car that is safe to drive worth over $1000. This is all so she can collect $539 per month for herself and two children. The foster parent who gets her children gets $820 plus. We spit on the mother on welfare as a parasite who is bleeding the taxpayers, yet we hold the foster and adoptive parents [who are bleeding ten times as much from the taxpayers] up as saints. The adoptive and foster parents aren’t subjected to psychological evaluations, ink blot tests, MMPI’s, drug & alcohol evaluations, or urine screens as the parents are.
Adoption subsidies may be negotiated on a case by case basis. [Anyone ever tried to "negotiate" with the Welfare Department?] There are many e-mail lists and books published to teach adoptive parents how to negotiate to maximize their subsidies. As one pro writes on an e-mail list: "We receive a subsidy for our kids of $1,900 per month plus another $500 from the State of Florida. We are trying to adopt three more teens and we will get subsidies for them, too. It sure helps out with the bills."
I can’t help but wonder why we don’t give this same level of support to the children’s parents in the first place? According to Cornell University, about 68% of all child protective cases "do not involve child maltreatment." The largest percentage of CPS/DSS cases are for "deprivation of necessities" due to poverty. So, if the natural parents were given the incredible incentives and services listed above that are provided to the adoptive parents, wouldn’t it stand to reason that the causes for removing children in the first place would be eliminated? How many less children would enter foster care in the first place? The child protective budget would be reduced from $12 billion to around $4 billion. Granted, tens of thousands of social workers, administrators, lawyers, juvenile court personnel, therapists, and foster parents would be out of business, but we would have safe, healthy, intact families, which are the foundation of any society.
That’s just a fantasy, of course. The reality is that maybe we will see Kathleen Crowley’s children on the government home-shopping-for-children web site and some one out there can buy them.
May is national adoption month. To support "Adoption 2002," the U.S. Postal Service is issuing special adoption stamps. Let us hope they don’t feature pictures of kids who are for sale. I urge everyone to boycott these stamps and register complaints with the post office.
I know that I’m feeling pretty smug and superior about being part of such a socially advanced and compassionate society. How about you?
Saturday, August 23, 2008
There is a lady who is posting messages on my daughter’s MySpace page. I don’t know this woman. She wrote me saying I was a bad parent because CPS took my daughter. She has no idea that CPS is corrupt. Maybe she does she works for a local attorney and most know CPS is corrupt. Anyhow, she is trying to influence my daughter so I posted this message on my daughter’s MySpace page so “One Crazy old Bitch” could read it and get the message
RECIPE FOR DISASTER-FOR "CRAZY OLD BITCH". This is in response to her HAM CASSEROLE dish she posted online
Current mood: aggravated Mother
RECIPE FOR DISASTER
1 Previously happy teenager
3 cup of police
20 Gallons of social workers (substitute with Sociopath)
10 pints school officials
6 foster homes
1 Nosy "crazy old bitch"
3 Myspace pages
1 Concerned Mom
1 Set of Nasty Grandparents
1 Vindictive Dad
Remove Previously happy teenager from school without a Warrant or reason
Mix Previously happy teenager with 1 cup Police. place in fridge until mixture hardens.
Add 2 gallons of social workers to 1 cup police
take Previously happy teenager out. mix with 5 Gallons Social workers and 1 cup police. stir.
Add in 1 foster home. Place mixture into a large pot
Add 10 cups of School officials. Bring to a boil. Lower heat and let simmer
Add 13 gallons social workers. stir
Combine 5 therapists with Teenager mixture and SHAKE. add to pot
Add 5 doctors. Blend
Add 1 Crazy old bitch to Therapist-teenager mixture. shake
Add 2 Myspace pages. stir the pot
Add 1 Mom and 1 myspace page. Shake
Take Previously happy teenager out and place in 5 more foster home mixtures. stir
Add Previously happy teenager to 5 more therapist. shake
now Blend it all together and what do you have?
One seriously mixed up unhappy teenager ............
Sprinkle with Dad and Grandparents and serve
HEY CRAZY OLD BITCH - I DON'T KNOW YOU. I DON'T KNOW YOUR INTENTIONS. LAY OFF FOR NOW. STOP WRITING MY DAUGHTER ON HER MYSPACE PAGE. GO FIND SOME FRIENDS YOUR OWN AGE
CPS scores another kid. Cha-ching-cha-ching-cha-ching-cha-ching
IMPEACH JORGE WOOSH NOW!
Friday, August 22, 2008
Thursday, August 21, 2008
THIS IS WHAT CPS HAS DONE TO MY CHILD. THEY REPEADILY TRAUMATIZED HER. THEY LIED, COCERCED, BLACKMAILED, ALIENATED AND THREATENED HER TO THE POINT WHERE SHE WAS SEVERELY DEPRESSED AND DISPONDENT. THERE WERE DAYS WHERE SHE WOULD SIT AND STARE AT THE FLOOR IN A CATATONIC STATE. SHE WOULD SIT AND COLOR WITH CRAYONS LIKE A 5 YEAR OLD CHILD. THEY TOLD HER TERRIBLE THINGS ABOUT ME. THEY TOLD HER SHE WAS NEVER GOING HOME AND HORRIBLE LIES. THEY COERCED HER BY OFFERING TO TAKE HER OUT FOR AN "IN AND OUT BURGER" IF SHE DIDN'T TRY TO CONTACT ME. SHE WAS THREATENED WITH JUVENILE HALL IF SHE DID. THEY TOOK HER TO THE HOSPITAL TO PUMP HER STOMACH TO SCARE HER. THEY REPORTED HER AS A RUN AWAY WHEN SHE WASN’T SO THEY COULD CLAIM SHE WAS A JUVENILE DELIQUENT. THEY SENT HER TO 5 FOSTER HOMES IN 5 MONTHS, EACH ONE GETTING WORSE THAN THE LAST ONE. THEY WANTED HER TO BECOME SUBMISSIVE AND THEY WERE SADISTIC TOWARDS HER. I WAS INITIALLY GIVEN ONLY 1 HOUR A WEEK "SUPERVISED" VISITS BEFORE THEY CUT OFF OUR COMMUNICATIONS COMPLETELY FOR NO REASON. OUR VISTS WENT GREAT YET SOCIAL WORKERS CONTINIED TO LIE AND FABRICATE REPORTS FOR THE COURT. CPS TOOK AWAY HER CELL PHONE SO SHE COULDN’T CONTACT ME. CPS USED THE POLICE TO HARASS ME AND EVEN THE SCHOOL PARTICIPATED IN THIS “WITCH HUNT”. TRIED TO BREAK OUR MOTHER-DAUGHTER BOND.
MY DAUGHTER STARTED CUTTING HERSELF WHEN SOCIAL WORKERS AND OTHERS KEPT TELLING HER I WAS CRAZY. EVEN THE CPS DIRECTOR LEE COLLINS TOLD JENNY THIS BUT JENNY TOLD HIM THESE WERE LIES. NONE OF THESE PEOPLE EVEN KNEW ME. THESE TERRIBLE LIES THINGS MADE JENNY VERY UNSTABLE AND SHE CUT ALL OVER HER WRISTS, ARMS, AND LEGS. SHE TRIED TO DULL THE PAIN FROM BEING ALIENATED. SHE BEGGED TO GO HOME BUT CPS DIDN'T CARE ABOUT HER RIGHTS. ALL THEY DID WAS TIGHTENED THE NOOSE MORE. THEY MADE HER LIVING CONDITIONS HORRIBLE. SHE WAS KEPT PRISONER, UNABLE TO SOCIALIZE OR HAVE ANY FRIENDS. SHE SAT IN HER ROOM AND WROTE POETRY DREAMING OF THE DAY SHE WOULD BE SET FREE. CPS WANTED TO MAKE SURE SHE DIDN'T RUN AWAY SO THEY ARRANGED FOR HER TO HAVE "CHAPERONES". SHE WAS WATCHED 24 HOURS A DAY AND WASN'T EVEN ALLOWED TO GO INTO HER BEDROOM ALONE. CPS PLACED HER IN A FOSTER HOME WHERE SHE LEARNED HOW TO SNORT PAIN KILLERS. SHE WAS VERY SAD AND LONELY BUT CPS DIDN'T CARE. THEY ALIENATED HER FROM ME.
AFTER 6 LONG MONTHS OF DEPRIVING HER OF OF MOTHER AND PROVIDING "NEGATIVE THERAPY" CPS STILL COULDN'T BREAK HER DOWN. EVEN HER ATTORNEY (WHO WAS WORKING FOR CPS) SAID “SHE’S A HARD NUT TO CRACK”. SINCE SHE STILL WANTED TO GO HOME THEY SHIPPED HER OUT OF THE STATE. THEY WANTED TO MAKE SURE THEY RECEIVED TITLE IV FUNDS. SHE WAS SENT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT AGAINST HER WILL. WHEN SHE ARRIVED THE PHONE WAS DISCONNECTED. SHE WAS UNABLE TO CALL FOR HELP. SHE WASN'T ALLOWED TO LEAVE THE HOUSE UNTIL SHE COULD PROVE THAT SHE WOULDN'T CONTACT ME. JENNY IS STILL A HOSTAGE. SHE IS COMPLETELY CUT OFF FROM ME - FOR NO REASON BUT FEDERAL BLOCK GRANTS.
DID YOU KNOW THAT MANY SOCIAL WORKERS ARE SADISTIC AND HAVE BEEN ABUSED AS CHILDREN YET THEY ARE NOT GIVEN MENTAL EVALUATIONS? MANY DON'T HAVE CHILDREN OF THEIR OWN AND MOST SOCIAL WORKERS LEAVE THE BUSINESS WITHIN 2 YEARS BECAUSE THEY GOT INTO THE BUSINESS TO HELP CHILDREN AND THEY LEAVE WHEN THEY FIND OUT WHAT CPS REALLY DOES TO KIDS. SOCIAL WORKERS CAN BE CRUEL, MANIPULATIVE, AND TWISTED. MANY ARE SOCIOPATHS. THE DIRECTOR OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA NEVER INVESTIGATED THIS IMPROPER REMOVAL. HE TOLD ME HE "DIDN'T CARE ABOUT THE LAW" AND THAT HE WAS "FRIENDS WITH THE JUDGE"YOU BE THE JUDGE!
PLEASE COMMENT ON MY BLOG IF YOU THINK MY CASE AND OTHERS SHOULD BE SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED!
For the Record I do NOT have any mental diagnosis. CPS obtained a false one on me and Jenny because they get additional federal funds. They are defrauding the Federal Government
Well here you have it folks. I was there with BJ and Weidner during part of this taping. Weidner came down from Oregon just to do this interview. He is a former District Attorney who knows the Judicial System inside and out. He admits that CPS and our Government IS kidnapping children for Federal Funds. CPS is guilty of kidjacking and profiteering using innocent children. CPS IS GUILTY OF RACKETEERING. THEY ARE VIOLATING THE "RICO ACT"
PLEASE HELP US REFORM CPS!
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Saturday, August 16, 2008
As caseloads surge, the state increases use of contractors, some of whom make $1 million or more in a year. The voter-approved initiative requires thousands of sex offenders to undergo mental health screening.
READ THE FULL LA TIMES ARTICLE AT:
Friday, August 15, 2008
See the flow chart on how the State makes money off our children?
COMING SOON TO A TOWN NEAR YOU - CPS REFORM!!!
This is part one. The power point presentation shows a more accurate picture of the flow of finds which show the corruption.
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
Here are some excerpts from this article that refers Director Lee Collins of San Luis Obispo Child "Protection" Services:
"Manipulated reports. Destroyed or discarded case information. Vindictive action against parents. Poor investigations. Even poorer background searches into licensed caregivers. The villainously creative practice of backdating documents."
"the preexisting friendship between Edge and Collins indicates that the appointment proved somewhat of a hookup."
"critics maintain that certain systemic barriers prevent the true enforcement of any real accountability within the department."
"the threats and blatantly vindictive decision-making finally trickled out." "the department holds lordship over its own documents."
"While conducting its own internal investigation with all mechanisms fully at the department's discretion Social Services has 90 days, by law, to review a case. This gives them plenty of time to cook up stories,"
"I know how they work. I've seen them do it."
"Certain social workers continue to twist documentation right under his nose, and the supervision system at Social Services often rewards such behavior".
"a "blacklist" system that prevents concerned employees from making positive changes. "fear and intimidation prove typical forms of influence or motivation within Social Services."
"Favoritism runs throughout the department, and if you dare speak up against a wrong and it sparks a nerve in the wrong person you are marked to be gotten ridden of"
"A source inside the San Luis Obispo County Employee's Association reported an extremely disproportionate number of grievances filed against Social Services".
"Most of the workers at Social Services are completely disillusioned by Collins' actions," said one department employee.
The Article goes on to state:
Collins explained that the proper removal or demotion of several popular but grossly underperforming caseworkers prompted questioning and contempt among certain staff circles. "I wish I could send a memo to everyone, but I can't. Meanwhile, the guy who got fired got to tell his side of it, and the mythology starts to take off," Collins said. "The concept that I'm stifling dissent is laughable," he continued. Mr. Collins is a cocky wordsmith. There are many complaints against his agency by former Social Workers who are fired if they don't perform.
Following the 2003 grand jury report, Social Services installed a stewardship program to mitigate potential employee grievances. However, no such mechanism yet exists to curb the foul play reported by the subsequent grand jury. In that regard, several recent case files reviewed by New Times cast doubt on the total reversal of a few dubious CWS practices. These cases rehash many of the problems illuminated by the 17 stories reviewed by the grand jury. Every family contacted declined to share specifics. Several cited potential CWS retribution as a motive to remain off the record.
THE SOURCE OF THIS ARTICLE CAME FROM SUE MC MEANS, VETERAN OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY AND WHO WORKED THERE FOR 20+ YEARS
A copy of this article can be found at: http://metafocus.net/~freeed/wikka.php?wakka=SocialDisservices
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Monday, August 11, 2008
When 0. J. Simpson pled "no contest" some years back to the charge of beating his wife, he was sentenced to psychotherapy. Cellular psychotherapy. He did it by telephone
How can OJ Simpson kill kill his wife, be sentenced to "telephone therapy" AND get his kids? Maybe someone should report this to CPS
THEY TAKE CHILDREN WHO ARE NOT ABISED AND PLACE THEM IN UNSAFE SITUATIONS.
All CPS cares about is M-O-N-E-Y. Here's the PROOF:
Sorry Jenny. Please don't be mad. I'm trying to get you home kiddo and Congress needs to see the TRUTH. You are getting wild being at your Dad's house and CPS has made you very unstable because of the lies they told you. I am working very hard to change laws and WAKE UP CONGRESS so they can see firsthand what CPS does to keep children and how they hurt them. When you get home maybe you can meet the Senators and tell them your story.
TO REPORT CPS COVER UP PLEASE CONTACT ME: email@example.com
Jenny doesn't understand how CPS has parents do ENDLESS therapy so they can make $$money$$. I did their "therapy" & what a joke.I completed my initial "case plan" but they didn't return my daughter on the date listed.They extended it like they always do. Cha-ching-cha-ching. You see, the CPS therapists are paid by the County and you are to see "their" therapists who are paid to write false reports. If they can't find a mental condition they will send you to several doctors, like in my case. CPS then faxed documents to this doctor who ruined my entire medical file.This is a HIIPA violation and Psychiatric abuse. If you are a victim contact CCHR: www.cchr.org
The reason they want "Therapy" is because they all make money. Cha-ching-cha-ching-cha-ching! CPS has "non-profit" organizations set up in "some counties" and guess who's on them? The Director of CPS, the Board of Supervisors, the school, Doctors, Lawyers, Therapists, etc...you get the picture-right? Cha-ching-cha-ching! Hey Santa Clara is under investigation for 400 MILLION DOLLARS OF BILLING FRAUD. Come to find out they were billing for children that didn't even exist. oops.
Did you know....That more Americans have died in psychiatric hands than in all the wars since 1776? REPORT PSYCHIATRIC ABUSE. IT'S A CRIME. Contact CCHR www.cchr.org Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
CPS likes to have everybody in "Therapy" and most everyone is diagnosed with a mental condition. 2/3 of the foster children are placed on Psychotrophic medication.Many take multiple strong mind altering drugs that damage their livers and slow their respitatory drives down.Many normal children are sent to "Mental Institutions" and are given MORPHINE.(Just ask Anthony). Many of these children turn into drug addicts and end up in prison. CPS likes to control people so they hold parents and children "Hostage" using Psychiatry.If you are a victim of Psychiatric abuse contact Citzens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHR)at www.cchr.org Email: email@example.com 800-330-7290
NoteI have no problem with people that "need" therapy or want therapy. But when CPS has your kid - BEWARE! You will need a witness and a TAPE RECORDER. Suggest "joint therapy" so you don't become a "victim".
Children are the future, but psychiatry is making sure 20 million won't have one....
REPORT PSYCHIATRIC ABUSE. ITS A CRIME. Contact CCHR email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Sunday, August 10, 2008
Does this look like an "abused" or "neglected" child? CPS tells the Court that Jenny decided not to come back to California after visiting her Dad in Iowa. They lied. Jenny was threatened.Social Worker Louise Tobin flew to Iowa days before she was to return to California. She made arrangements for Jenny to be watched 24 hours a day. Jenny was forced to work at a Daycare center so she could be "babysat" while her father was at work. Dad disconnected his phone so Jenny had no way to call for help. She would sneak me messages when her Dad was sleeping. CPS is one sick agency. THEY ARE EVIL.
STATEMENT-JENNY...17 in 1 Mo & CPS violates her Rights. CPS traumatize Jenny who is now cutting on herself because she wants to come home!
Poor Jenny. CPS has done everything to brainwash her against me. They've threatened her with Juvenile Hall, put her in "negative therapy", coerced her with "In & Out Burgers"....in attempts to stop her from contacting me. They even took her to the hospital to try to "pump her stomache". CPS tells children up lies, they try to turn children against their parents (facism)by alienating them, they manipulate children and and try to give them false memories. This is CHILD ABUSE!!!
What's wrong with CPS???? My daughter was never abused. The ONLY person who has EVER abused my daughter is CPS! My daughter is now cutting on herself because she wants to come home. She has NEVER cut on herself before CPS entered her life. She started doing this after they told her they were going to take her away from me.
They had no right to kidnap Jenny from school. There was no warrant and no placement agreement. CPS falsified the documents and traumatized my daughter.....all for MONEY!!
- ► 2009 (177)
- Senator Nancy Schaffer on CPS Corruption & Links
- Legally Kidnapped: New policies make it harder for...
- Arrests of Central Coast men in child porn sting o...
- KIDDIE PORN IS RUNNING WILD THROUGHOUT SAN LUIS OB...
- Kiddie Porn in San Luis Obispo
- ADOPTION BONUSES (S 3038 getting ready to double!!...
- President Bush threatens World War III
- Recipe for Disaster - A delicious Dish of deciet ...
- Kucinich Presents 35 Articles Of Impeachment Again...
- Psychiatry Past To Present Part 1
- Rip Off Report: Salinis California CPS, Child, Pro...
- CPS KIDNAPPED & TRAUMATIZED MY 17 YEAR OLD FOR FED...
- C.P.S. is Government KIDNAPING says former DA WE...
- Chrissy at the DC Festival 2008
- DHS Corruption
- Psychiatric Abuse-Jessica's Law
- Jenny recent Pic-MySpace.com Photos - .:Ocean[eyes...
- Child Protection Services Prank Call (Part One)
- Home Grown Terrorism
- FUCK YOU CPS
- Money for Children? YEP. your kids are worth alot ...
- Legal child abuse in the USA
- Article about CPS of San Luis Obispo-Social Disser...
- Parental Alienation is CHILD ABUSE
- OJ SImpson kiled his wife, did phone "therapy " a...
- CPS Cover up
- Psychiatric Abuse Brainwash #2 My clueless one.......
- Psychiatric Abuse & Brainwash #1
- STATEMENTS-JENNY'S FRIENDS
- STATEMENTS-JENNY'S FRIENDS #2
- STATEMENTS-JENNYS FRIENDS #3
- JENNYS STATEMENT & FRIENDS
- STATEMENT-JENNY'S FRIEND
- JENNYS STATEMENTS-THE TRUTH WILL PEVAIL
- STATEMENT-JENNY...CPS abuses children.........
- CPS Violates children's rights-obstructs Justuce
- STATEMENT-JENNY...17 in 1 Mo & CPS violates her Ri...
- "Governments gone wild"....a letter from a friend ...
- REWRITING LAWS & CHANGING HISTORY
- Somebody HAS to do it.....
- Attorney's on board throughout the United States
- Read the POLITICAL REFORM ACT. Take a good look a...
- ▼ August (42)
- Resources & Articles - Families unite Facebook
- Google Profile-Families Unite
- CENTRAL REGISTRY (temporary link-working on)
- Families Unite 4 Children's Rights Foundation Website
- JOIN CAUSE (facebook)
- DONATE - HELP REFORM CHILD WELFARE
- **COMING SOON** STATE/NATIONAL REGISTRY
- CAUSES: Multiply - Families Unite
- My Space - Kathleen & Jenny
- Project: CPS Reform
- osoluckyme's You Tube showing CPS Corruption
Legal & Research-CA.
- State Agencies Directory
- REPORT FRAUD-Medical, Social Security, CalWORKS
- Foster Care Audits & Rate Letters-Governor's Ofc
- Inspector General Audits of Child Welfare
- Foster Care Studies & Audits
- Child Welfare Mailing Addresses by County (PDF)
- CPS-Human Resources-Hiring (Merit System Services)
- Adopt US Kids-Listings of children for lease
- CPS -- California Psychoanalytic Society
- CPS Human Resources
- Department of Social Services
- Non Profit Agency research (990 tax forms)
- Child Welfare Agencies (CPS)
- Human Trafficking & Racketeering
- Forms-Lawsuit, Intake, Case Review, Services
- Class Action Intake Form
- Statistics & Research
- PETITION: Requesting all INJUSTICES within the CA Court be Revisited
- National Alliance for Family Court Justice
Groups & more Blogs
Anonymous, You mentioned AZ and legislators being... - Anonymous, You mentioned AZ and legislators being told not to delve into CPS matters. Is there anyway we can talk? Can you contact a Miracle for Two Sister...2 years ago
- Alcatraz-edero, CA, United States
- I raised my daughter alone since she was 7 months old. She was kidnapped by San Luis Obispo CPS. This agency took her from school for no reason and committed fraud. She was taken for FEDERAL FUNDS. The Father owed a lot of back child support and lost two custody battles so he used CPS. Her Dad lives out of state and has been in and out of her life. About me: I've owned several businesses which have given me the ability to work from home. My daughter often helped me with my business.Together we traveled over the world and we had a beautiful home. We had a nice life....until CPS kidnapped my child! We were the average American family. I was even a foster mother for CPS at one time.CPS has ripped our life apart. They took my daughter because of false allegations without ever investigating.