WARNING: CRIME ALERT! CPS "Child Protection Services" is kidnapping children! Stop Organized Crime! View San Luis Obispo Children Non Profits: http://www.box.net/shared/cnp6fok9i8 View your county: visit: www.guidestar.com

Saturday, January 24, 2009

TYRANT DIRECTOR OF CPS IN SLO EMAILS

8/21/08

What are you trying to pull now Collins?  You yelled at my daughter telling her I had a DUI years ago and you now you seem intent on getting me falsely convicted  so you can keep my daughter in the system. You even had your social workers slander me and my daughter's  cell phone was taken to the Police station so you could use the Police to harass me and spread the slanderous lies you told them.

You really are a tyrant. Hope your proud of your  kid jacking empire. Have you ever thought about what you are doing to all of these children?

Kathleen
- Hide quoted text -

On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 6:55 PM, osoluckyme-gmail wrote:
You can save it. I have the proof. You can't sue me for libel when everything I'm saying is true.

YOU ARE A KIDNAPPER.
YOU STEAL CHILDREN FOR PROFIT.
YOU WILL BE EXPOSED

Have a nice day

Kathleen
ps how come the income went up by 75% on your non-profit?


----- Original Message ----- From:
To: "Kathleen Dearinger"
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 1:46 PM

Subject: Re: Contact Us (response #1153)

Ms. Dearinger:

Everything you have said is a complete and total fabrication, based on your
own imagination and the nonsense that you probably are picking up from
websites established by child abusers, the pro-spanking lobby,
anti-governmental zealots and the lunatic fringe.

I have never said that I was "friends" with judges.  You asked if I knew
them, and I indicated that I know most of them, but only in a passing
professional capacity.

We do not receive any personal monetary reward for taking children into our
custody.  The IV-E funds about which you rave must be matched by County
dollars at 60% of the non-Federal share.  These funds pay only for the cost
of care.  It is expensive--very expensive--for us to keep children in
out-of-home care.  This is why we do far less of it than most of our peers
in other counties.  And, when we do have to remove children,  we place them
with relatives more than any other county in California.

There are no "Adoption Saturdays."

I have had zero involvement in your criminal case.

To the extent that you continue accusing any member of the Department of
Social Services of violating any laws--knowing as I do that you do not have
any evidence of such violations, as none have occurred--I will seek redress
against you for your libel.

You refuse to seek competent legal counsel.  You lie about your criminal
history.  You refuse to do the one simple thing that would have resulted in
reunification:  Your refusal to seek counseling, based apparently on your
paranoid delusions about our influence upon therapists--is in itself
evidence of your troubled mental state..

When the ultimate reckoning occurs, you will have to face the facts of your
own complete and utter abandonment of your daughter.  And all the websites
you create, videos you post, congressmen you visit and letters you write
will never compensate for your denial of the simple request made of you by
Jennifer:  "Mom, just get the counseling."

Lee Collins




           "Kathleen
           Dearinger"
                      .com>                     lcollins@co.slo.ca.us
                                                                      cc
           07/07/2008 02:13
           PM                                                    Subject
                                     Re: Contact Us (response #1153)







Mr. Colllins,

I don't know what kind of  sick "game" you think you are playing, but I
assure you will regret kidnapping my only child.  I am quite resourceful
and  I have no problem exposing this corruption. You have abused your
position as a Director of  the San Luis Obispo CPS.

You think your slick by having your social worker Amy Sensenbach  kidnap my
daughter from school for no reason. Then  you  ship her  out of state in
the middle of the night so she can't contact me. When she arrives the phone
is disconnected and she is stripped of her cell phone and is unable to
leave the house.   Don't worry  Jenny was still able to get in touch with
child advocates when no one was watching. She stays up late  to record the
events and  these recorded statements will be given to the proper
authorities who will be investigating you.

My daughter  tells how sadistic you are .  She goes into great detail about
the abduction. Her  story is  quite compelling. Her  statements will be
heard by many. Everything is documented, including your own statements of
how you don't care about the law and how  you are  "friends" with the
judges. We have detailed information on everyone involved, including the
non-profit organizations you are affiliated with,  the income you are
embezzling from stealing children.

You are in collision with Attorney's, therapists, doctors, judges, CASA and
others. You influence criminal court cases and have the District Attorney
unfairly  prosecute parents so you can keep children in the system. You
give parents and children "mental conditions" when you cannot find abuse or
neglect. You violate HIIPA laws and allow your workers to fabricate
documents and fax  information to doctors, violating HIIPA laws and
ruining  medical files. You violate  State and Federal laws, WIC laws and
many  others.  Your agency is  unethical and you use deceitful practices to
obtain children.  You don't care about the  families you destroy and how
you  damage normal healthy children.  You are corrupt.

Now you are now attempting to overturn two previous court orders in which I
was awarded physical custody by fabricating lies for the court and omitting
facts.  You are using  these false statements to keep my child "hostage".
Your agency had  never even  been to my house or investigated before
stealing my child. Now it appears that your social worker, Louise Tobin is
filing a  388 petition to give custody to the father. You are doing this to
obtain Title IV E funding. You are fraudulently obtaining these funds for
there never was any child abuse or neglect. you are simply taking advantage
of my ex-husbands hostility.  You are aware that the father is using your
agency to get  out of paying child support and are allowing him to use your
agency to finance his  "custody battle".  You are are improperly using
Federal funds for personal gain.  You are aware that my daughter has been
drinking alcohol and doing drugs while in Iowa, yet you have allowed her to
remain in a hostile situation against her will.

We have information about your agency; the social workers and how they
coerced my daughter, the bribes,  the chaperone's, etc. My daughter
reveals everything, including her meeting with the Judge.   I know all
about the "adoption Saturdays" in which attorney's and Judges celebrate
kidnapping kids and how you purposely give the parents false mental
conditions  so you can steal children. I have no intention of paying for
foster care, false doctor visits, negative therapy, travel expenses, or
anything else that has to do with your kidnapping my daughter who has been
a "hostage"  since January. My family has been unfairly victimized by your
agency and you have obstructed justice. You are guilty of conspiracy for
committing fraud and may I remind you that stealing children for profit is
"racketeering".

I have plenty of evidence against you Mr. Collins.  You are a tyrant. You
are one sick puppy. You took my only child and you will not get away with
it.   I promise.

Have a great day


Kathleen Dearinger
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:49 AM, wrote:
 Good morning, Ms. Dearinger

 The Board of Supervisors has referred your inquiry to me for response.

 As you know, your daughter was removed from your care and placed in our
 custody by the Juvenile Court.  A service plan was established that would
 have resulted in your daughter being returned to you, but you were unable
 or unwilling to follow the simple requirements of that plan that was
 ordered by the Court.

 We have looked into the allegations that you make concerning your
 daughter's safety and find them to be unsubstantiated.

 As always, your best option is to retain competent counsel to assist you
 in
 this important legal matter.

 Thank you for your inquiry.


 Lee Collins, Director
 San Luis Obispo County Department of Social Services


NOTE: There are emails he said telling me he was going to turn me into a "Marytr". I don't have my computer with me but you can clearly see that the man is a TYRANT. He's trying to force me to see a "therapist" in SLO County. I went to a therapist out of the area. He didn't like that. Could it be because he is the Director on the Mental Health and is also on the non-profit? I think so. Oh the corruption is so thick in SLO

Friday, January 23, 2009

Thursday, January 22, 2009

YOU BE THE JUDGE

Written to a Judge who contacted me:

Dear Judge XXXXXX, (names edited for privacy)

I spoke with Senator XXXXX a few weeks ago and have been meaning to call her back. Senator XXXXX knows my story and has been instrumental on bringing this situation to light.

We have a huge corruption problem going on in California and throughout the rest of nation. Good people are being destroyed by a system that was meant to help children. As a former foster parent I am appauled at what has become of the Child protection "industry".

I don't want my daughter to be part of this corruption. She's been sheltered for most of her life and she doesn't understand this sort of evil. My daughter had a very good life with me and we had a nice home. I own a business and I have taken my daughter all over the world. I have raised Jenny since she was 6 months old on my own and we are very close. Jenny was taken last January when she was 16 1/2 years old. CPS took my daughter and my best friend for no reason at all and they did horrible things to her.

Although it is true that my daughter and I had a squabble over a boy I disapproved of last December and I did admit to slightly damaging a "door" to my own home. I had no idea this was a crime or the nightmare I would have to endure because of this agency. An officer told me he did not feel this was child abuse and I cannot see anywhere in the law that state it is. Given the fact that my daughter is almost an adult I feel this incident was taken to the extreme. The damage was done after my daughter was being difficult and I insisted she go with me Christmas shopping. She wanted to sneak out to be with the boy so she kicked me in the lungs and I had an asthma attack. I have emphysema. I did not damage the door to hurt my daughter but rather it was to protect her from seeing the Juvenile deliquent abusive boyfriend. I was trying to open a locked door. CPS took Jenny and conspired with the Police who threw me in jail on $100,000 bail. The door was barely damaged and it was replaced. Jenny was returned 5 days later and we were told to go to counseling. We did everything CPS told us to do and I thought that was it. 43 days later they simply kidnapped my daughter from school.

*** JENNY WAS NOT TAKEN BECAUSE OF A "DOOR". SHE WAS TAKEN OVER A PAPER CLIP CUT THAT SHE INFLICTED TO HERSELF BECAUSE OF CONTINUAL VISITS BY A SOCIAL WORKER AT CPS ***

There were no fights during this 43 day period. Jenny and I usually get along great. My ex-husband started sending emails to the social worker right after she returned home. During this time period Jenny was receiving regular visits from a social worker at school without my knowledge. Jenny would come home moody and lock herself in her room while I obtained parenting books. I called CPS to better understand what was going on with my daughter and I even requested that they remove this social worker from our case. I felt she was biased after reading her report and correspondence with my ex who had made false allegations. My request was denied. This social worker wanted my daughter to see a "certain" therapist. Jenny didn't like the therapist, explaining that she was trying to negatively influence her thoughts.

I allowed Jenny to switch therapists but when the social worker found out she didn't like this. When I called my therapist to report that Jenny had cut herself on her arm at school wiith a paper clip the social worker used this as an excuse to take my daughter; stating this was an "emergency removal. Jenny was taken within two hours after I told her social worker I had found Jenny a different therapist. A FALSE mandated report was made AFTER my daughter was removed.

I would never have guessed that CPS could do such a thing, after all there has never been any history of me abusing Jenny. But CPS distorted and twisted the truth in court for no real reason. I feel they were prejudice against me because of the lies my ex-husband told them. He had lost TWO prior custody cases. I left my ex when Jenny was just a baby and although he was abusive towards me when we were together this never stopped me from letting him see his daughter. In fact, I even let him live on my ranch and work for my business. I had no malice towards him, but apparently he remained bitter. He always told me he had no intention of paying his back child support even after I had lowered his support to 275.00 a month with no interest. I feel certain he used CPS to get custody of our daughter and now I am losing everything I own because of it. CPS is not "custody court" and my daughters father is not a better parent than I am. Taking my daughter away served no real purpose other than traumatizing her.

As a mother it is painful to see how corrupt this agency is in San Luis Obispo. I saw how they hurt Jenny and made her emotionally unstable. Social workers and others coerced, bribed and threatened her. They used scare tactics that were sadistic in nature using "punishment-reward techniques". When Jenny told them she wanted to go home they placed her with chaperones 24 hours a day. She wasn't even allowed to go to the bathroom by herself. She was placed i 5-6 different foster homes and all I could do was cry. I visited her regularly while her father did not. He disconnected his phone. I was only able to see her 1 hour a week "supervised" and eventually CPS cut off all contact. Jenny started cutting all over herself but they still alienated her from me.

When she ran away and came home she was hunted down like prey and dragged back into foster care. She pleaded with everyone including her Attorney and the Judge to let her go home and even applied to become emancipated but Judge Picquet denied all of her requests. He also kept her off court record and told her she was going to "be a good little girl and get on the plane." She was forced to get on a plane in the middle of the night to "Iowa" where her father lives in a trailer.

Once there her cell phone was taken away and she was kept hostage. She wasn't allowed to leave the house and social workers forced her to get a job at a daycare center so she would be monitored while her father worked. This also prevented Jenny from making her court dates which CPS scheduled purposely while she was on a "visit" with her Dad. Jenny did NOT want to be in Iowa and she continued to cut. She told the Ankeny Police and social workers there but no one listened.

CPS went on witch hunts against me. They manufactured false evidence which they used in court. I took all of their drug and alcohol tests which proved I don't have a substance abuse problem but they wanted me to attend classes anyhow so they could get funding. They didn't notify me of court dates so I wouldn't be able to attend and this is how Jenny became a ward of the Court.

Everyone worked in collusion with one another. CPS has terrorized me for speaking out, even using the police who have manufactured lies and have broken into my home without a warrant. My court documents have been stolen and I suspect tampered with. The courts in SLO stamped the back of my filings and withheld my case files from me. CPS breaks every law that exists pertaining to Children Welfare and they do not follow the WIC guidelines. I had an attorney that I paid to help me but apparently he works closely with CPS. He did not represent my best interest. CPS is now using his partner as my daughter's Guardian Ad Litim who said to me "your daughter is a hard nut to crack". That says it all. No one represented my daughter's best interest. There was NO investigation. No one visited my home and CASA never even met my daughter.

CPS had no right to take my daughter for they had no true case of child abuse or neglect and they did not have a warrant as required by law.

CPS violated HIIPA laws and faxed confidential information to the doctors and slandered me. I didn't even know this Doctor and my health was jepordized because of their interference. Lies were placed into my medical file due to their slander and the doctor and therapist refused to give me copies of my file.

The Director of CPS Lee Collins told me he would turn me into a "Martyer" if I fought back. I brought a file cabinet to my meeting with him with all the laws and he told me he didn't care about the law and was "friends with the Judge". The Police issued me a false DUI to stop me from speaking out in Washington DC and now I have a warrant which is based on the another lie.

I have done TV and radio shows but CPS in San Luis Obispo keeps slandering my name and they even call into the radio stations stating that I am crazy when I do not have any mental condition. They do this tp parents to keep my daughter in the system. They have also placed an unlawful "gag order" on me but I pointed out to the Judge that he is required to uphold the US Constitution and asked him what is the big secret - the "paper clip or the door". This made him angry, especially after I offered to let him see his elected official form that he signed to uphold the Constitution. Then they tried to cite me on contempt. It was getting worse and after several house raids I decided to flee the state.

The State of California dropped the "door" charges but they still have my child.

The kangaroo courts that parents have to face due to CPS are horrendous. There is no justice in San Luis Obispo. I had videos, tape recordings and text messages from Jenny but they didn't care. CPS flagged the videos I had on YouTube of that Jenny and I made when she ran home because they wanted to hide the truth. Even the State Ombudsman wouldn't meet with me. It seems that the entire system is broken. The police won't charge the people who broke into my house and stole $30,000.00, my car, our belongings and now the bank has cut off my line of credit due to this fraud. My house is in foreclosure now and soon I will loose my business that was worth over 1 million dollars. Did I deserve this?

I never got the chance to present the truth.

This is why I want permission to take my daughter out of this country so that justice can prevail. I want to meet with the United Nations so we can open up these "secret" courts. I feel certain this would not have happened if spectators were witnessing the events and equally certain that there are other cases just like mine. I have reviewed the Geneva Treaty on Human Rights and many articles were were violated.

SIR, WE NEED TO LIFT THE VEIL AND OPEN UP THE COURTS SO JUSTICE CAN BE SERVED

Your Thoughts?

Kathleen Dearinger
Families Unite 4 Children's Rights Foundation
formally of San Luis Obispo County CA

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Eugenics in America: A Brief History

Eugenics in America: A Brief History

America’s experimentation with genetics as a tool for social change is not new. In the 1920s the United States became the world center of eugenic activity and social policy. From 1907-1960 more than 100,000 innocent Americans were sterilized in more than 30 states. In the 1930s and 1940s Hitler’s scientists took eugenics to the extreme - establishing human breeding farms for "Aryans," large-scale sterilization and euthanasia programs for the mentally and physically disabled, and death camps for the races they deemed "genetically inferior" or "unworthy life."
Both the American and German eugenics movements of the 1920s and 30s identified human beings as either hereditarily valuable or inferior. They established programs to purify the "race" of "lower grade" and "degenerate" groups, thus extending racism to include a new generic classification - the "genetically inferior." Not surprisingly, the targets always turned out to be the traditional victims of racism - Jews, Gypsies, Blacks, Indians, and other minorities.

After Hitler’s defeat, the American eugenics movement fell into disfavor, appealing primarily to the KKK, neo-Nazis, and a small groups of old-line scientists steeped in the racist theories of the pre-war period. In the 1960s their key spokesman was Stanford physicist William Shockley, who was the first to suggest offering cash incentives to people with low IQ scores who would agree to sterilization. He called his proposal the "voluntary sterilization bonus plan." Despite his status as a Noble laureate, Professor Shockley was widely regarded as a racist and a kook within the academic community. Nevertheless, he laid the foundation upon which the new eugenics movement would eventually be resurrected.

In 1974, Federal District Court Judge Gerhard Gesell estimated that "over the last few years" between 100,000 and 150,000 low-income persons were sterilized under federally funded programs. Ruling on behalf of plaintiffs in a class action suit, Judge Gesell stated that "an indefinite number" of those sterilized were "improperly coerced" into accepting sterilization. Judge Gesell observed that "the dividing line between family planning and eugenics was murky" (Relf v. Weinberger et. al. U.S. District Court of D.C., March 15, 1974). In may cases welfare patients were told that they could lose their benefits if they did not submit to the sterilization procedure. On September 21, 1975 The New York Times Magazine reported that doctors in major cities were routinely performing hysterectomies on mostly black welfare recipients as a form of sterilization, a practice that came to be known euphemistically among medical insiders as the "Mississippi appendectomy."

Today those who advocate eugenics have access to far more sophisticated technologies than those of their pre-war predecessors. For example, Norplant, a drug approved by the FDA in 1990, provides an alternative to permanent sterilization for women by preventing pregnancy for up to five years. A popular proposal to reduce the birthrate among welfare recipients and unwed teens is to induce them, through monetary incentives of the threat of a loss of benefits, to have Norplant surgically implanted in their upper arm. In 1991, Kansas representative Kerry Patrick defended a proposal to offer $500 to any welfare mother who accepted Norplant, saying the program "has the potential to save the taxpayers millions of their hard-earned dollars. Something must be done to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies..." (The New York Times, Feb. 9, 1991).

In 1994, legislators in Connecticut and Florida introduced bills that would provide cash bonuses for welfare recipients who accepted Norplant. Florida and Colorado have introduced incentive programs for men to accept sterilization. the Florida bill would offer $400 to men living below the poverty line for undergoing a vasectomy; the Colorado bill would allow criminals early release. While none of these bills has yet become law, the momentum for eugenic solutions is growing. If current trends continue, we can expect to see such sterilization programs gain legal sanction across America.

Back to Main Eugenics Page

Don't drug a child and . . .Say NO To Psychiatry!

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

AMERICANS MURDERING JUDGES - US JUDICIAL CORRUPTION

Americans Murdering Their Judges,
and the US Crisis of Judicial Corruption

by Dr Les Sachs (Dr Leslie Sachs)

In the headlines are the appalling news stories of Americans carrying out murderous attacks on judges and their families. In a matter of days, one judge was shot and killed in his own courtroom, while another judge had family members brutally murdered in their home.

These news stories are, however, related to another news story, which is the most taboo subject of the American media - the expanding crisis of corruption among American judges and lawyers. At question is whether the deepening despair of Americans about their own legal system, is fueling some of these violent attacks on judges.

Much is written now about how America's economy is resembling that of a banana republic, given how America is sunk in preposterous debt, and how the US dollar currency is sinking toward a possible collapse in the near future.

But there is another way that America is also like a banana republic, in that its legal system - contrary to its Hollywood image - has become a sinkwell of secret proceedings, the jailing of the innocent, and political misconduct; and how it is sullied with documented corruption, fake trials and court fraud.

These facts are not generally understood, because of how judicial corruption is the most un-reported news story in the American landscape. It is the category of news story which America's newspapers and media are most afraid to report, even when clear proof is in their hands.

In America right now, judges - and lawyers who are protected by judges - can commit felony crimes in broad delight, leave the proof lying around, and yet avoid being prosecuted or even having their crimes be reported by the media. The people who work in the media see a lot of material on court misconduct, and yet they know this is the story of which they dare not speak. The lack of media coverage, in turn, encourages more judicial corruption, leaving millions of Americans in anger and despair.

Confronting the secrets of US judicial corruption, is a key to understanding America's whole social crisis, and its role in the world right now. Here are some elements of this situation that you won't see in run-of-the-mill news reports:

The innocent in USA courts: imprisoned, sentenced to death, losing all they have

The key statistic to understanding America, is that it has over 2.2 million prisoners (!) out of about 300 million people. This is 25 per cent of all the prisoners, anywhere, in the entire world. By comparison, the most populous nation, China, with about 1.3 billion people, only has a few hundred thousand prisoners, despite being denounced by the USA as a "repressive" country.

1 out of every 45 working-age males (that is, not counting children or the elderly) is BEHIND BARS in the United States. With working-age black males, the figures are about 1 out of 20. This is the stuff of revolution.


Rest of article found at:
http://www.banned-in-america.net/americans-murdering-their-judges.html

Monday, January 19, 2009

It's time to OPEN up the "Secret" Courts America!

As many of you know Juvenile Courts in America have been "secret" for 33 years. Ever since The Child Abuse Prevention Act (CAPTA) was created in 1974 many innocent parents have lost their children due to unfair court rulings based on lies and deceit. It's time to lift the veil of secrecy! Too many children have died. Too many families are being torn apart. The crimes against humanity are beyond comprehension. Now is the time for all of us to speak out.

I need everyone to write to President Obama at the link provided below:

http://change.gov/page/s/yourstory

Once this is done please have 1 person from each state contact me so we can move to the next level. We will need at least 10-15 of the "worst cases" of court abuse to be presented. Please make sure you have evidence and witnesses who can attest to these facts and that it is well documented. I need someone who is a good speaker. I will be starting with California and moving West.

GET READY AMERICA - WE'RE FIGHTING BACK. LET 2009 BE THE YEAR THAT WE OPEN THE COURTS

Sunday, January 18, 2009

JENNY FOR CONGRESS!

This is from my daughter's MySpace page. She's 17 years old. gotta love it.

Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 12:42 PM

crap off my nachos (hey I didn't name it)

"words are only words.... anyone can spit them out.
honestly i could care less if you like me or not.
I'm not a transformer. I cant shapshift into whatever you want me to be...

If you love me then THANK YOU if you hate me then FUCK YOU"

-lady soverign she is one smart little british lady......"


NOTE FROM MOM: What a little warrior my daughter is. Such a fighter and I'm so proud of her. She has spoken out but the system keeps silencing her. They flag her videos and even her CPS reform video that she placed on her MySpace page.

I put Jenny on my Foundation, Families Unite 4 Children's Rights because this agency violated her Civil Rights as well as many other laws. I hope my daughter will speak out and tell people what CPS did to her once she turns 18. They alienate children and badmouth parents to turn them against their own parent. What facists and all for
M-O-N-E-Y!! Shame on CPS!

These are not the words of a helpless abused child. This is my daughter who I raised to think independently. She fought for year to come home. We will be giving proof of what they did to everyone. WE WILL REFORM CPS

HEY CPS: you will never destroy my daughter's spirit and tenacity because she's a "chip of the 'ole block"!

Jenny for Congress!!!

SEND YOUR STORY - JUSTICE AWAITS!

Dear Friends,

Change is coming! Please send your story to
http://change.gov/page/s/yourstory

The main points could be (use your own
words or feel free to use the following):

A new form of pernicious violence against women and children is
rampant in our country.

1. Across the country, family courts are removing children from
parents (mostly mothers) who are trying to protect them from physical
and sexual harm. Even nursing infants are torn from their non-abusive
mothers. Courts are placing these children in the custody of the very
parents whom the children insist are abusing them. Protective pare
nts are bankrupted trying to protect their children from batterers
and molesters, who use family courts to obtain custody of their
victims and avoid prosecution. The right of parental access trumps
the right of child safety.

2. Family courts have become lawless star chamber proceedings with no
due process or checks and balances. Courts have unfettered power with
no effective oversight that would ensure that children are safe from
physical and sexual harm. Appeals are ineffective because they are
lengthy, prohibitively expensive, and do not address child safety
concerns.

3. Because of our government's complete lack of responsiveness to
these violations of child safety, a petition was filed with the Inter-
American Commission on Human Rights. Older children are speaking out
about their court-ordered abuse, which in some cases is comparable to
third world rape and torture camps.

4. We need Federal hearings and investigation to bring this hidden
problem to light,20to return the children to their protective
parents, and to hold accountable the perpetrators and the systems
that enable and order their abuse.

5. In my case (a few sentences of the most egregious events in your
case. You can even provide photos and videos.)
If you include the names, county, state of those who harmed your
child, there is always a concern about retribution if the court
somehow finds out. You could always state that you fear retribution
and are using a pseudonym, which is a powerful and accurate statement.

Here is a great article that might help if you want to add more
information.
http://www.justicewomen.com/help_family_law.html#one

A few other websites you could add to your email are:
www.leadershipcouncil.org,
www.stopfamilyviolence.org,
http://kathleenrussell.com/ThisYearsWork2.htm,
www.courageouskids.net,
http://ca3cacaca.blogspot.com,
www.distinctioninfamilycourts.com,
www.batteredmotherscustodyconference.org,
www.protectiveparents.com,
www.mothers-of-lost-children.com,
www.thelizlibrary.org,
www.canow.org,
http://www.jfcadvocacy.org,
www.protect.org,

Thank you for your strength and courage and don't be shy about naming names. These people who broke the law need to be prosecuted. Shame on CPS for hurting children.

con⋅spir⋅a⋅cy - Definition

What is "conspiracy"? Lets find out.
definition according to: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conspiracy

con·spir·a·cy (kÉ™n-spîr'É™-sÄ“) Pronunciation Key
n. pl. con·spir·a·cies
An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
A group of conspirators.
Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.
A joining or acting together, as if by sinister design: a conspiracy of wind and tide that devastated coastal areas.

YEP. THAT DESCRIBES THE CHILD PROTECTION "INDUSTRY"

Therapists, Doctors, Lawyers, Child Advocates, Hospitals, Politicians, & various programs. Even the media won't listen. Who do these children have who will look out for their interest? The system has failed.

NOTE: I am not referring to "everyone" who works at CPS. I am referring to many social workers and the people at the top. There are MANY people who think they are helping children because of the lies they were told. If you want to help children find out the truth. Meet the parents. Sit on the child death review boards. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!

Please help innocent parents. These children need a voice.

"God Bless America...my home sweet home"

If you want to help reform CPS please contact me at fu4crf@gmail.com
LETS TURN THESE PRETENDERS IN!

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT - UNITED NATIONS

If we can't be heard by anyone here in America then lets go international. Tell them how our Government is committing "genocide" on innocent American families

Here is a list of the Judges:
http://www.icc-cpi.int/chambers/judges.html

Thank you Aimee Allen

Aimee Allen wrote at 4:20am
Love what you do.... I have my own nightmare CPS story that had me endlessly talking about it for years.. yet, no one listened. I had no choice but to put it in to my music....and the pain and the torture of what CPS did to me is probably why i write songs in the first place. But... I back you and I just wanted to let you know.
keep fighting the good fight my friend.
Love,
Aimee
Wall-to-Wall - Write on Aimee's Wall

Friday, January 16, 2009

Mona Gudbranson (NY) - CPS caused daughter's suicide

This is "another" tragic result of Child "Punishment" Services. I know Mona and her story is so sad. Where is the memorial for all of the families and children this agency has committed "genocide" on? Shame on America. shame on CPS

Atty. Gregory A. Hession - Part 1/2

Monday, January 12, 2009

Charlotte Iserbyt - Deliberate Dumbing Down of the World

Some schools like Atascadero High are teaching children how to be homosexual. My daughter was removed right after I mentioned doing "homeschooling" due to my business travels. I had no idea they get federal funds for helping CPS kidjack children or that homeschooling was up before the senate.

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Pt 1/3 Greg Pound 's kids kidnapped by CPS --Alex Jones Show

It's all true.

Also visit this page:
http://www.waragainsttheweak.com/offSiteArchive/www.sfgate.com/index.html

Post your PROOF of CPS CORRUPTION with Dr. Phil

Upload your tape recordings, videos, and other proof of corruption to:

http://www.drphil.com/plugger/respond/?plugID=11547

Shame on CPS!

Monday, January 5, 2009

Attorney Speaks out about corruption

by Gina Sestak

The toughest job I've ever held, emotionally, was representing indigent parents in Juvenile Court dependency proceedings.

"Dependent" children are those who are abused, neglected, or otherwise without parental care or control. So you probably think their parents are scuzzball slime, right? WRONG.

Most of my clients were poor people caught in a system that employed just-out-of-college middle class kids to go out into homes and determine whether children were at risk. Turn-over in their job was tremendous. Most lasted no more than 6 months or, at most, a year. I handled cases in which these social workers deemed children to be at risk and had them removed from their homes by the police because:

* there was a cat seen sleeping on a child's bed

* the children (ages 11, 14, and 15) were home alone (at 3:00 in the afternoon while their parents were grocery shopping)

* the parents couldn't explain how a child had been injured (the injury occurred sometime during a two day period during which the child had been in the care of relatives on both sides of the family as well as with the parents)

* the child's burn wasn't properly treated for 5 days (but my client had taken her daughter to the emergency room right after the accidental burn happened; it was the hospital who sent her home with ointment instead of properly assessing the extent of the injury)

* the child has bruising on his lower back (this was "Mongolian spots," a dark pigmented area commonly seen on kids with East Asian ancestry)

* they were living in a shelter (their home had burned down)

These caseworkers also testified that parents were unfit because "the mother took that child on a city bus" and "although the children have proper beds, their mother is sleeping on a mattress on the floor" (my client's explanation: she thought it was more important to spend limited funds on the kids' needs rather than her own). When one mother did some wildcrafting (this was when "Stalking the Wild Asparagus" was popular), the caseworker accused her of making the children eat weeds.

All this was going on while real abuse and life threatening situations were being ignored. One caseworker failed to take action when, during a home visit, she noticed that a previously alert baby had become lethargic. "I just figured he was retarded or something," she testified, explaining why she left him there to die of a brain injury. And, in a case that actually made the newspapers (most Juvenile Court proceedings are kept confidential), three mentally challenged girls were sexually abused by their father and his friends for years, despite repeated reporting of suspicions by their school. Reported sexual abuse of a toddler was discounted when the doctor who was supposed to perform an exam refused because the child screamed and seemed terrified when he tried to examine her. So, without evidence, she was sent back to the abusive home.

Once the kids were in foster care, parents were limited to one one-hour visit per month, in the presence of a caseworker. One caseworker noted that my client seemed "unable to control" her 5 young children during these visits - the kids, who only saw each other during these visits, tended to get a little rowdy. Another faulted how my client interacted with her child - my client, who had been raised Amish, explained that she had not been raised to make a public show of emotion. A caseworker tried to stop visitation with my client (the father) because the child would be out of control when he went back to the foster home -- her example: the little boy didn't want to stop playing with a truck his father had given him. Another caseworker made my clients come to visits for more than six months "to prove they would show up," but never brought the children to the visits. Another testified that my client had failed to keep a visitation appointment without calling to cancel as if that were proof of irresponsibility, even though my client had provided her with a newspaper article showing that she (the client/mother) had been in an automobile accident and was in a coma on the day of the scheduled visitation.

I could go on for pages, but I'll stop here.

The job was a project funded by Allegheny County through the Allegheny County Bar Association. I and another attorney - Katherine B. Emery, who is now a Judge in Washington County -- handled all of the cases ourselves. It was described as "part-time," although hearings started at 8:30 a.m. every day and sometimes continued into the evening. We were expected to provide our own offices, etc. out of a small stipend that was often paid months late. Three judges heard cases, and Kathy and I were constantly running from one courtroom to another. The few minutes out of court were spent in a waiting area, interviewing our clients and trying to prepare cases on the fly. Research, appeals, etc. had to be done on the weekends.

After about two years, I walked out of a court room and punched out a window in the attorney waiting area. I realized that it was only matter of time before I hit a social worker or a judge.

The project is still in existence, but now it has funding, offices and full time employees.

And me? I'm still burnt out.

Sunday, January 4, 2009

NON PROFITS OF SLO: And the beat goes on... cha-ching cha-ching-cha-ching

http://www.box.net/shared/cnp6fok9i8/rss.xml

To find your county visit: www.guidestar.com
Do a search under "children" "mental health" "drug and alcohol" or any organization that's associated with Child Protection Services. Don't forget to look up your local friendly Police Department! Start uploading!!

Ready, Set, GO!!

ps. make sure you do a feed and put on facebook. Join me in my campaign to reform CPS

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Form-Attorney complaints in California

GALComplaints

LETS START OUR OWN MEDIA CAMPAIGN

But first you gotta think Jewish so here's a handbook for those of you who need to brush up on your yiddish:

http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-yiddish-handbook-40-words-you-should-know/

MATZA BALLS AND ZIONISTS

We all know the Jews control 98% of the media. That's why CPS is hiring Zionist to work in the higher up positions. I found their websites recruiting Jewish social workers and other positions. I've read the reports that state "improve media relations". If my dead JEWISH grandmother knew what this agency is doing she be spitting up her MATZA BALLS. I GUARANTEE you my feisty old Grandmother would have had the MEDIA pounding down their mishegas doors!! It's not kosher to kidnap kids. What a bunch of schmucks. oy vey

~Kathleen

ps. I'm posting this on both of my blogs because CPS is monitoring them and I want to make sure that CPS's Jewish attorney see's it. I called Sally Flanders, the Jewish lady who hands out Federal funds to let her know CPS was committing fraud by illegally obtaining Federal Funds.

Thursday, January 1, 2009

MAY 2008 BE THE YEAR WE OPEN UP THE "SECRET COURTS"

IF ENGLAND CAN DO IT - SO CAN WE!!!

It's time that we forced our Government to STOP THE SECRECY~
Let's open the "Secret Courts" and DEMAND Jury trials
Let's stop the fraud and corruption
Let's demand accountability and oversight
Let's protect the Civil liberties of Families & Children
Let's expose the injustices & involve the General Public
Let's change laws so children stop suffering





Happy New Year Jenny
May 2009 be the year we get justice!

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Senator Nancy Schaefer's update Sept 2008 on "The Corrupt Business of Child Protection Services"

LETTER FROM SENATOR NANCY SCHAEFER
Current mood: accomplished
Category: Blogging


Updated: September 25, 2008


THE CORRUPT BUSINESS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES


BY: Nancy Schaefer

Senator, 50th District


My introduction into Child Protective Service cases was due to a grandmother in an adjoining state who called me with her tragic story. Her two granddaughters had been taken from her daughter who lived in my district. Her daughter was told wrongly that if she wanted to see her children again she should sign a paper and give up her children. Frightened and young, the daughter did. I have since discovered that parents are often threatened into cooperation of permanent separation of their children.

The children were taken to another county and placed in foster care. The foster parents were told wrongly that they could adopt the children. The grandmother then jumped through every hoop known to man in order to get her granddaughters. When the case finally came to court it was made evident by one of the foster parent's children that the foster parents had, at any given time, 18 foster children and that the foster mother had an inappropriate relationship with a caseworker.

In the courtroom, the juvenile judge, acted as though she was shocked and said the two girls would be removed quickly. They were not removed. Finally, after much pressure being applied to the Department of Family and Children Services of Georgia (DFCS), the children were driven to South Georgia to meet their grandmother who gladly drove to meet them.

After being with their grandmother two or three days, the judge, quite out of the blue, wrote up a new order to send the girls to their father, who previously had no interest in the case and who lived on the West Coast. The father was in "adult entertainment". His girlfriend worked as an "escort" and his brother, who also worked in the business, had a sexual charge brought against him.

Within a couple of days the father was knocking on the grandmother's door and took the girls kicking and screaming to California. The father developed an unusual relationship with the former foster parents and soon moved to the southeast. The foster parents began driving to the father's residence and picking up the little girls for visits. The oldest child had told her mother and grandmother on two different occasions that the foster father molested her.

To this day after five years, this loving, caring blood relative grandmother does not even have visitation privileges with the children. The little girls are, in my opinion, permanently traumatized and the young mother of the girls was so traumatized with shock when the girls were first removed from her that she has never completely recovered. The mother has rights but the father still has custody of the children.

Throughout this case and through the process of dealing with multiple other mismanaged cases of the Department of Family and Children Services (DFCS), I have worked with other desperate parents across the state of Georgia and in many other States because their children were taken for no cause and they have no one with whom to turn. I have witnessed ruthless behavior from many caseworkers, social workers, investigators, lawyers, judges, therapists, and others such as those who "pick up" the children. I have been stunned by what I have seen and heard from victims all across this land.

In this report, I have focused mainly on the Georgia Department of Family and Children Services (DFCS). However, I believe Child Protective Services nationwide has become corrupt and that the entire system is broken beyond repair. I am convinced parents and families should be warned of the dangers.

The Department of Child Protective Services, known as the Department of Family and Children Services (DFCS) in Georgia and other titles in other states, has become a "protected empire" built on taking children and separating families. This is not to say that there are not those children who do need to be removed from wretched situations and need protection. However, this report is concerned with the children and parents caught up in "legal kidnapping," ineffective policies, and an agency that on certain occasions would not remove a child (or children) when the child was enduring torment and abuse.

In one county in my District, I arranged a meeting for thirty-seven families to speak freely and without fear. These poor parents and grandparents spoke of their painful, heart wrenching encounters with DFCS. Their suffering was overwhelming. They wept and cried. Some did not know where their children were and had not seen them in years. I have witnessed the "Gestapo" at work and I witnessed the deceitful conditions under which children were taken in the middle of the night, out of hospitals, off of school buses, and out of homes. In one county a private drug testing business was operating within the agency's department that required many, many drug tests from parents and individuals for profit. It has already made over $100,000.

Due to being exposed, several employees in this particular office were fired. However, they have now been rehired either in neighboring counties or in the same county again. According to the calls I am now receiving, the conditions in that county are returning to the same practices that they had before the light was shown on their evil deeds.

Having worked with probably 300 cases statewide, and now hundreds and hundreds across this nation and in nearly every state, I am convinced there is no responsibility and no accountability in Child Protective Services system.

I have come to the conclusion:

that poor parents very often are targeted to lose their children because they do not have the where-with-all to hire lawyers and fight the system. Being poor does not mean you are not a good parent or that you do not love your child, or that your child should be removed and placed with strangers;

that all parents are capable of making mistakes and that making a mistake does not mean your children are to be removed from the home. Even if the home is not perfect, it is home; and that's where a child is the safest and where he or she wants to be, with family;

that parenting classes, anger management classes, counseling referrals, therapy classes and on and on are demanded of parents with no compassion by the system even while the parents are at work and while their children are separated from them. (some times parents are required to pay for the programs) This can take months or even years and it emotionally devastates both children and parents. Parents are victimized by "the system" that makes a profit for holding children longer and "bonuses" for not returning children to their parents;

that caseworkers and social workers are very often guilty of fraud. They withhold and destroy evidence. They fabricate evidence and they seek to terminate parental rights unnecessarily. However, when charges are made against Child Protective Services, the charges are ignored;

that the separation of families and the "snatching of children" is growing as a business because local governments have grown accustomed to having these taxpayer dollars to balance their ever-expanding budgets;

that Child Protective Services and Juvenile Court can always hide behind a confidentiality clause in order to protect their decisions and keep the funds flowing. There should be open records and "court watches"! Look who is being paid! There are state employees, lawyers, court investigators, guardian ad litems, court personnel, and judges. There are psychologists, and psychiatrists, counselors, caseworkers, therapists, foster parents, adoptive parents, and on and on. All are looking to the children in state custody to provide job security. Parents do not realize that the social workers are the glue that hold "the system" together that funds the court, funds the court appointed attorneys, and the multiple other jobs including the "system's" psychiatrists, therapists, their own attorneys and others.

that The Adoption and the Safe Families Act, set in motion first in 1974 by Walter Mondale and later in 1997 by President Bill Clinton, offered cash "bonuses" to the states for every child they adopted out of foster care. In order to receive the "adoption incentive bonuses" local child protective services need more children. They must have merchandise (children) that sells and you must have plenty so the buyer can choose. Some counties are known to give a $4,000 to $6,000 bonus for each child adopted out to strangers and an additional $2,000 for a "special needs" child. Employees work to keep the federal dollars flowing;

State Departments of Human Resources (DHR) and affiliates are given a baseline number of expected adoptions based on population. For every child DHR and CPS can get adopted, there is the bonus of $4,000 or maybe $6,000. But that is only the beginning figure in the formula in which each bonus is multiplied by the percentage that the State has managed to exceed its baseline adoption number. Therefore States and local communities work hard to reach their goals for increased numbers of adoptions for children in foster care.

that there is double dipping. The funding continues as long as the child is out of the home. There is funding for foster care then when a child is placed with a new family, then "adoption bonus funds" are available. When a child is placed in a mental health facility and is on 16 drugs per day, like two children of a constituent of mine, more funds are involved and so is Medicaid;

As you can see this program is ordered from the very top and run by Health and Human Resources. This is why victims of CPS get no help from their legislators. It explains why my bill, SB 415 suffered such defeat in the Judicial Committee, why I was cut off at every juncture. Legislators and Governors must remember who funds their paychecks.

that there are no financial resources and no real drive to unite a family and help keep them together or provide effective care;

that the incentive for social workers to return children to their parents quickly after taking them has disappeared and who in protective services will step up to the plate and say, "This must end! No one, because they are all in the system together and a system with no leader and no clear policies will always fail the children. Just look at the waste in government that is forced upon the tax payer;

that the "Policy Manuel" is considered "the last word" for CPS/DFCS. However, it is too long, too confusing, poorly written and does not take the law into consideration;

that if the lives of children were improved by removing them from their homes, there might be a greater need for protective services, but today children are not safer. Children, of whom I am aware, have been raped and impregnated in foster care;
It is a known fact that children are in much more danger in foster care than they are in their own home even though home may not be perfect.

that some parents are even told if they want to see their children or grandchildren, they must divorce their spouse. Many, who are under privileged, feeling they have no option, will divorce and then just continue to live together. This is an anti-family policy, but parents will do anything to get their children home with them. However, when the parents cooperate with Child Protective Services, their behavior is interpreted as guilt when nothing could be further from the truth. Fathers, (non-custodial parents) I must add, are oftentimes treated as criminals without access to visit or even see their own children and have child support payments strangling the very life out of them;

that the Foster Parents Bill of Rights does not stress that a foster parent is there temporarily to care for a child until the child can be returned home. Many foster parents today use the Foster Parent Bill of Rights as a means to hire a lawyer and seek to adopt the child placed in their care from the real parents, who are desperately trying to get their child home and out of the system. Recently in Atlanta, a young couple learning to be new parents and loving it, were told that because of an anonymous complaint, their daughter would be taken into custody by the State DFCS. The couple was devastated and then was required by DFCS to take parenting classes, alcohol counseling and psychological evaluations if they wanted to get their child back. All of the courses cost money for which most parents are required to pay. While in their anxiety and turmoil to get their child home, the baby was left for hours in a car to die in the heat in her car seat by a foster parent who forgot about the child. This should never have happened. It is tragic. In many cases after the parents have jumped through all the hoops, they still do not get their child. As long as the child is not returned, there is money for the agency, for foster parents, for adoptive parents, and for the State.

that tax dollars are being used to keep this gigantic system afloat, yet the victims, parents, grandparents, guardians and especially the children, are charged for the system's services.

that grandparents have called from all over the State of Georgia and from other states trying to get custody of their grandchildren. CPS claims relatives are contacted, but there are many many cases that prove differently. Grandparents who lose their grandchildren to strangers have lost their own flesh and blood. The children lose their family heritage and grandparents, and parents too, lose all connections to their heirs.

that The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in 1998 reported that six times as many children died in foster care than in the general public and that once removed to official "safety", these children are far more likely to suffer abuse, including sexual molestation than in the general population. Think what that number is today ten years later!

That according to the California Little Hoover Commission Report in 2003, 30% to 70% of the children in California group homes do not belong there and should not have been removed from their homes.


RECOMMENDATIONS


Call for an independent audit of all State Child Protective Services (CPS) and for a Federal Congressional hearing on Child Protective Services nationwide.

Activate immediate change. Every day that passes means more families and children are subject to being held hostage and their lives destroyed.

Abolish the Federal and State financial incentives that have turned Child Protective Services into a business that separate families for money.

Grant to parents their rights verbally and in writing.

Mandate a search for family members to be given the opportunity to adopt their own relatives if children need to be removed permanently.

Mandate a jury trial where every piece of evidence is presented before permanently removing a child from his or her parents. Open family court. Remove the secrecy. Allow the press and family members access. Give parents the opportunity in court to speak and be a part of their children's future.
Require a warrant or a positive emergency circumstance before removing children from their parents. (Judge Arthur G. Christean, Utah Bar Journal, January, 1997 reported that "except in emergency circumstances, including the need for immediate medical care, require warrants upon affidavits of probable cause before entry upon private property is permitted for the forcible removal of children from their parents.")
Uphold the laws when someone fabricates or presents false evidence. If a parent alleges fraud, hold a hearing with the right to discovery of all evidence made available to parents.

FINAL REMARKS

On my desk are scores of cases of exhausted families and terrified children. It has been beyond me to turn my back on these suffering, crying, and beaten down individuals.

We are mistreating the most innocent. Child Protective Services have become an adult centered business to the detriment of children. No longer is judgment based on what the child needs or who the child wants to be or with whom, or what is really best for the whole family; it is some adult or bureaucrat who makes the decisions, based often on just hearsay, without ever consulting a family member, or just what is convenient, profitable, or less troublesome for the social workers.

I have witnessed such injustice and harm brought to so many families that I am not sure if I even believe reform of the system is possible! The system cannot be trusted. It does not serve the people. It obliterates families and children simply because it has the power to do so.


Children deserve better. Families deserve better. It's time to pull back the curtain and set our children and families free.


"Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and the needy" Proverbs 31:8-9


Note from Kathleen Dearinger to Senator Schaefer:

You are a true inspiration to many and I consider you to be my friend. Thank you for being there for me and for everything you have done to help families throughout the United States. You truly are a Mother Theresa to all of us. God Bless you and all the families and children who are fighting for justice

Monday, December 29, 2008

Governor's memo authorization collection of children

READ THIS MEMO FROM THE GOVERNOR. HE STATES THAT 68% OF THE PRISION POPULATION ARE DROPOUTS YET MISSES THE FACT THAT 70% ARE FORMER FOSTER KIDS. LOOKS LIKE AB219 IS PART OF THE PROBLEM IN CALIFORNIA & THE REASON THE SCHOOLS ARE IN COLUSION WITH THE POLICE & MANY OTHERS. BINGO. THIS EXPLAINS WHY MY DAUGHTERS SCHOOL DROPPED OFF HER SCHOOL RECORDS AT THE ATASCADERO POLICE DEPARTMENT. THE WIC LAW STATES THAT CPS CANNOT TAKE A CHILD BECAUSE THEY ARE DITCHING SCHOOL. A CHILD IS ONLY SUPPOSED TO BE REMOEVED IF THEY ARE IN IMMINENT DANGER FROM SERIOUS BODILY HARM. DITCHING SCHOOL BECAUSE THEY HAVE A BOYFRIEND AND BEING A TYPICAL TEENAGER IS NOT ABUSE. CPS HAS THE SAFE FAMILIES ACT WHICH IS SUPPOSED TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO FAMILIES YET THEY RARELY DO. CHILDREN ARE DYING IN FOSTER CARE YET OUR GOVERNMENT IS INCREASING FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS WHICH IS INCREASING THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN WHO ARE IN FOSTER CARE. THESE KIDS ARE BEING TRAUMATIZED AND MANY ARE DYING BECAUSE OF A CORRUPT SYSTEM.

Fcik Gov Letter Ab219

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Title IV Fraud - income guidelines to qualify for funds

CLICK ON THE TITLE FOR TITLE IV FLOW CHART FEDERAL FUNDING

In order for CPS to qualify for TITLE IV funding the parents must fall within the income guidelines. CPS never questioned me about my income. They knew I owned a business and real estate. Maybe this is why they are trying to make me loose my house....interesting. I wonder if it has something to do with the new program they offer foster parents. They are offering houses to people who become foster parents. The CORRUPT-O METER is working overtime.

DHS worker emails - shhhhhh this is how they kidnap kids

TAKE A LOOK AT THE FORM LETTER THEY GIVE TO HOSPITALS TO TAKE NEWBORNS. SCROLL DOWN. More departmental emails are uploaded online. Soon to be released!!! Social Worker Memos

Board of Supervisors - pecking order

Saturday, December 6, 2008

CPS pimped out my daughter at taxpayers expense

Just as I thought...It must be my "CPS corrupt-o sniffer" working overtime again. My detective senses told me the new "job" my daughter began over the summer working for daycare center "Tender Years" was no average job.

It seems that this job in Ankeny Iowa was procured just in time so it would distract my daughter from attending her own hearing in California. I became concerned when Jenny told me she was forced to work at Tender Years. She said she had to stay there until her Dad returned home from work; sometimes working for 12 hours. In court the Social worker claimed that Jenny found this job.... but I was already a step ahead. I seriously doubted that my daughter would be able to locate a job without a telephone or arrange funding to be paid to a daycare center that is licensed by Social Services... so I had called the daycare center myself. I spoke to the Owner. She confirmed my suspicions and stated she was recieving money from the state for my daughter working there. BINGO. CPS commits perjury AGAIN!!

The question remains - which state paid this daycare center and under what program were they paid? Was it CALWORKS or did CPS work out an arrangement with CPS in Iowa? My daughter wasn't a legal resident of Iowa and nor did my ex-husband have legal custody. Jenny was on a "visit" so how was CPS able to pull this one off??

Looks like CPS defrauds our Government and uses taxpayer money to do it. County counsel was a bit worried when I mentioned it so they forced Jenny to lie on the stand. I wonder what they have to hide????? Maybe we should call Social Services and both State licensing boards.

Here's the daycare center:
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=tender+years+daycare+center+ankeny&fb=1&view=text&latlng=3143508117599737565

Thursday, December 4, 2008

Grand Jury in SLO refuses to hear testimony - Father's Rights Activist suspected in tampering with case

Well here's the sad facts: The Grand Jury in San Luis Obispo has now refused to hear our testimony !!! CPS gets off from committing fraud - AGAIN.

We originally had a hearing scheduled for Oct 20, 2008. They agreed to let me testify by telephone since I do not want to return to California due to Police harassment. The Jury admonished me to secrecy, which I fully complied with. During my conversation with a Grand Juror I was asked to put them in touch with a certain person who is covering CPS cases throughout the US. I won't mention this persons name encase the Jury decides to change their mind, however, the confident is a father's rights activist who is not personally involved with my case.

Almost immediately after having contact with this individual the Grand Jury called back stating they needed additional time. My contact told me they were gathering evidence on other cases to determine whether a full investigation was warranted. I was told to gather other cases similiar to my own which involved the same individuals so this information could be presented. I contacted other families and obtained their statements and sent a link to my website which had tape recordings and text messages my daughter had sent me. Included was her message to the Grand Jury. This contact did not accept the link which invited them to my online account that held the evidence. This information was supposed to be given to the Grand Jury because I did not want my location to be disclosed until my case was resolved for fear of retalliation.

Suddenly now the Grand Jury tells me they are not going to hear my case. They told me not call back ..........so how is that for justice????


NO REASON WAS GIVEN FOR CANCELLING OUR HEARING !!

When I confronted this contact the phone suddenly went dead ......

Could it be that a Father's Right Activist actually destroyed my daughter's testimony and chances of returning home ???

It seems that once again CPS escapes justice. I'm beginning to think there isn't anyone who cares about children in this "Child Protection Racket". All of the evidence has been ignored and the Grand Jury has yet to review the evidence, tapes and text messages my daughter wrote to me.
I wonder just who is profitting off my child. One has to wonder just how deep this corruption runs.....

My daughter calls The Grand Jury "DARTH VADER". She tells me no one cares.

Stay tuned because this Mother ain't givin up that easy...........

MORE LOCAL NEWS:

Next door (Santa Barbara) is being investigated

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Clinical Research - Grants are being given to conduct Human Studies on minorities (NIH Policy)

Clinical Research & Human Studies

2.1.3 NIH Policy on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research
NIH policy requires that women and members of minority groups and their subpopulations must be included in all NIH-supported biomedical and behavioral research projects involving clinical research unless a clear and compelling rationale and justification establishes to the satisfaction of the relevant IC Director that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the research. Exclusion under other circumstances may be made by the Director, NIH, upon the recommendation of an IC Director based on a compelling rationale and justification. Cost is not an acceptable reason for exclusion except when the study would duplicate data from other sources. Women of childbearing potential should not be routinely excluded from participation in clinical research. All NIH-supported biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects is defined as clinical research. This policy applies to research subjects of all ages.
The inclusion of women and members of minority groups and their subpopulations must be addressed in developing a research design appropriate to the scientific objectives of the study. The Research Plan should describe the composition of the proposed study population in terms of sex/gender and racial/ethnic group, and provide a rationale for selection of such subjects. Such a plan should contain a description of
Part III: Policies, Assurances, Definitions, and Other Information Version 2 - III-15 PHS SF424 (R&R) Application Guide
the proposed outreach programs for recruiting women and minorities as participants. See http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/women_min/women_min.htm.
2.1.4 NIH Policy on Reporting Race and Ethnicity Data: Subjects in Clinical Research
See NIH Policy on Reporting Ethnicity/Race and Sex/Gender in Clinical Research in Part II, 5.8.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) defines minimum standards for maintaining, collecting, and presenting data on race and ethnicity for all grant, contract, and intramural proposals and for all active research grants, cooperative agreements, contracts, and intramural projects. The minimum standards are described in the 1997 OMB Directive 15, http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/ombdir15.html.
The standards were revised in 1997 and include two ethnic categories (Hispanic or Latino, and Not Hispanic or Latino) and five racial categories (American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and White). The categories in this classification are social-political constructs and should not be interpreted as being anthropological in nature. NIH is required to use these definitions to allow comparisons to other Federal databases, especially the census and national health databases. Federal agencies will not present data on detailed categories if doing so would compromise data quality or confidentiality standards.
Collection of this information and use of these categories is required for research that meets the NIH definition of clinical research. See Part II, 5.8 for additional information.
2.1.5 NIH Policy on Inclusion of Children
Research involving children (see definition of "child") must comply with the NIH Policy and Guidelines on the Inclusion of Children in Clinical Research. Investigators should obtain full copies of the Policy and Guidelines from NIH staff, or from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/children/children.htm.
NIH policy requires that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21) must be included in all clinical research, conducted or supported by the NIH unless there are clear and compelling reasons not to include them. Therefore, proposals for clinical research must include a description of plans for including children. If children will be excluded from the research, the application or proposal must present an acceptable justification for the exclusion.
The involvement of children as subjects in research must be in compliance with all applicable subparts of 45 CFR Part 46 as well as with other pertinent Federal laws and regulations.
IRBs have special review requirements to protect the well-being of children who participate in research. These requirements relate to risk, benefit, parental/guardian consent, and assent by children, and to research involving children who are wards of the state or of another institution. The local IRB approves research that satisfies the conditions set forth in the regulations.

DEFINITION OF SOCIALLY AND ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED INDIVIDUALS:

Policies, Assurances, Definitions, and Other Information Version 2 - III
PHS SF424 (R&R) Application Guide page 34
Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Individual. A member of any of the following groups: Black Americans; Hispanic Americans; Native Americans; Asian-Pacific Americans; Subcontinent Asian Americans; other groups designated from time to time by the Small Business Administration (SBA) to be socially disadvantaged; or any other individual found to be socially and economically disadvantaged by SBA pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 637(a).

Monday, November 24, 2008

My daughter....after 11 Months of captivity (CPS prisioner)

This is why I despise CPS. There was no child abuse. This is a case of a social worker who broke the law because of a corrupt CPS director. This was a KIDNAPPING. They violate my daughters rights and my 17 year old is a hostage to CPS.........All for money. They should be ashamed of themselves.
I will be uploading the tape recordings. Some are very disturbing but they need to be heard so people will understand how corrupt and how EVIL Child Protection Services has become.


Posted by Picasa

Friday, November 21, 2008

Call in to Alex Jones Show!

My partner Patience Summers....GO GIRL!!

Sunday, November 16, 2008

CPS abuses children more than parents-statistics

We can tell you stories for hours where CPS employees committed criminal acts and were prosecuted and went to jail and/or were sued for civil rights violations. CPS workers have lied in reports and court documents, asked others to lie, and kidnapped children without court orders. They even have crossed state lines impersonating police, kidnapping children and then were prosecuted for their actions. There are also a number of documented cases where the case worker killed the child.

It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even killed at the hands of Child Protective Services. The following statistics represent the number of cases per 100,000 children in the United States and includes DCF in Connecticut. This information is from The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect (NCCAN) in Washington.
Perpetrators of Maltreatment

Physical Sexual Medical
Abuse Abuse Neglect Neglect Fatalities CPS
160 112 410 14 6.4
Parents
59 13 241 12 1.5

Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per 100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers.

Monday, November 10, 2008

Sunday, November 9, 2008

CPS CORRUPTION IN SAN LUIS OBISPO CALIFORNIA EXPOSED!!!: *GOOD RESOURCES*

CPS CORRUPTION IN SAN LUIS OBISPO CALIFORNIA EXPOSED!!!: *GOOD RESOURCES*
RESEARCH:
http://aspe.hhs.gov/HSP/cps-status03/
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/protective01/cpslitrevb.htm#A
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/protective01/index.htm#EXHIBIT2
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/CPS-status03/state-policy03/index.htm-national http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/CPS-status03/state-policy03/AppendixB.htm http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/CPS-status03/summary/index.htm
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/CPS-status03/CPS-practices03/index.htm
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/CPS-status03/state-policy03/chapter6.htm#Investigation -
http://www.hhs.gov/
http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/statistics/adoption.cfm
http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/state/ http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/statistics/
http://aspe.hhs.gov/HSP/cps-status03/
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/protective01/cpslitrevb.htm#A
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/protective01/index.htm#EXHIBIT2
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/CPS-status03/state-policy03/index.htm-national
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/CPS-status03/state-policy03/AppendixB.htm
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/CPS-status03/summary/index.htm
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/CPS-status03/CPS-practices03/index.htm
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/CPS-status03/state-policy03/chapter6.htm#Investigation
http://www.hhs.gov/
http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/statistics/adoption.cfm
http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/state/
http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/statistics/
http://ndas.cwla.org/
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/stats_research/index.htm http://www.ncsl.org/print/cyf/cwsystems.pdf
http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/federal/
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/congress/sacwis.htm
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/congress/status.htm
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm06/cm06.pdfstatistics
http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/witnessdvall.pdf
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/CPS-status03/CPS-practices03/index.htm
http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/CPS-status03/CPS-practices03/ch4.htm#t4.6
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/abuse_neglect/nscaw/index.html#reports http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/CPS-status03/state-policy03/apc.pdf http://edocs.dhs.state.mn.us/lfserver/Legacy/DHS-4575-EN
http://www.nccpr.org/
http://www.nccpr.org/reports/2007californiaror.pdf

NON PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
www.melissadata.com/lookups/np.asp - by state
http://www.guidestar.com/ - look up
http://www.hks.harvard.edu/hauser/people/researchers_staff/ekeating_fraud.pdf - research

STATE CONSTITUTION (GAG ORDERS & judicial corruption)
http://www.constitution.org/cons/usstcons.htm
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_6 (article VI Judicial)- California

FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICE - CALIFORNIA
http://www.fppc.ca.gov/index.html?id=51
http://www.fppc.ca.gov/Act/Act08.pdf Political Reform Act -Laws CALIFORNIA

CA FAIR POLITICAL ACT: (SECTIONS)
1. General. § 81000 - 81016
2. Definitions. § 82000 - 82055
3. Fair Political Practices Commission § 83100 - 83124
4. *Campaign Disclosure. § 84100 - 84511
4.5 Online Disclosure. § 84600 - 84612
5. Limitations on Contributions § 85100 - 85802
6. *Lobbyists. § 86100 - 86300
7. *Conflicts of Interests. § 87100 - 87500
8. Ballot Pamphlet. § 88000 - 88007
9. Incumbency. § 89000 - 89001
9.5. *Ethics. § 89500 - 89522
10. *Auditing. § 90000 - 90007
11. *Enforcement. § 91000 – 91015

Note: 91015 gives immunity to Elected officials (research proposition 208)

Monday, November 3, 2008

Sunday, November 2, 2008

San Jose Mercury Dependency Court Expose feat. Karen de Sa

The corrupt CPS courts are exposed on NBC by reporter Karen De Sa with the Mercury News. GO KAREN!! More....More...More
Karen's been investigating CPS cases for the past year. Marjorie Ludstrom with the Sacranento Bee in Sacramento is doing a pretty good job of covering CPS and now CPS in Sacramento is going to be having an audit because of all the foster children that are dying. Good job Marjorie!

KEEP EM COMING!!

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Alex Jones Chews out CPS Socio-worker

ALEX JONES CHEWS OUT SOCIO-WORKER

The People Who Protect Our Children

CPS is one DISCUSTING AGENCY. I hope people sue their asses. If they paid attention to the abused children and stop stealing normal kids they'd do a better job of protecting kids. ABOLISH CPS